Subject: Re: enclaves on stamps<br/>
Date: Sep 23, 2004 @ 09:47<br/>
Author: Anton Zeilinger (&quot;Anton Zeilinger&quot; &lt;anton_zeilinger@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="15562.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15565.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic15250.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="15562.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15564.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1547862922"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; See also Brownlie, in African Boundaries, p. 1099, writing on a<br/>
&gt; possible Botswana/Namibia/South Africa/Zimbabwe (don&#39;t know the<br/>
&gt; correct abbreviations, BwNmSaZm?), where he states that &quot;a<br/>
&gt; trigonometrical reference point has no dimension&quot; and thus no<br/>
&gt; connection exists.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Sorry, not South Africa, obviously, but Zambia.<br/>
<br/>
Also, please read: ... and thus no common boundary between Botswana<br/>
and Zambia as well as Namibia and Zimbabwe would exist (if it was an<br/>
actual quadripoint).<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; Cheerio,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Anton </span></blockquote></div>