Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: enclaves on stamps
Date: Sep 19, 2004 @ 02:41
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"_______________________________
> <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > ok mike
> > this feels much better to me yet again
> >
> > thank you
> >
> >
> > & wouldnt you know i actually had to cut off the
> bottom of your
> > message again just now in order to add this
> comment on top
> >
> > i swear it
> >
> > so you have cosmically outstacked me now for the
> 3rd time
> > & i celebrate this attainment with you of your
> stacking hat trick &
> > authentic multiple prowess
> >
> > just as i celebrate & appreciate your
> acknowledgements of my
> > own extremities & enormities here below too
> >
> >
> > & i would answer your excellent new question as
> follows
> >
> > to avoid confusion as well as contention
> > i would simply qualify all claves & maybeclaves
> alike
> > by the year in which they were last heard from or
> reported
> >
> > thus amaz karki 2004
> >
> > & amaz tatlis 1978 or whatever
> >
> > etc
> >
> > so by 2005
> > if neither are heard from or reported again
> > say by the cia or the local schoolmaster
> > or anyone else remotely credible
> > karki becomes a maybeclave
> > but far less of a maybeclave than the tatlis now
> are
> >
> > & to indicate confirmed discontinuation
> > which is a different matter
> > we could give dates fore & aft
> >
> > but i have run out of
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > Where would you write? Still needs more
> specificity
> > > in terms of addressing. Call it a postal
> expedition
> > > perhaps. There may be a real expedtion there in
> a
> > > couple of years.
> > > If anyone can outstack or outmessagecite it
> would be
> > > you. You have cited more messages than anyone
> else,
> > > along with creating more messages than anyone
> else,
> > > along with replying to your own messages more
> than
> > > anyone else.
> > > "i will simply offer & endeavor to answer
> frankly your
> > > any fair & simple question"
> > > Ok. By your reasoning, anyone could say that
> the
> > > other
> > > 4 exclaves are "maybeclaves" since they haven't
> > > been "heard from" since the date of the last map
> > > showing them. Would you call them maybeclaves
> as
> > > well? That is a fair and simple question.
>
> yes it is & please excuse the unavoidable
> interruption above
>
> & i have cut off the entire bottom of the message
> now
> so we have plenty of room to grow it again
>
> but first to return to your upper question
> which is also right on
> of where specifically i would write
>
> i dont know what the seat of government of tatli is
> but i do know azerbaijan uses rayons
> & i still need to check this
> but if tatli is in the vicinity of kazakh
> as i tentatively believe it is
> then the name of the rayon is most probably qazax
> & its rayon seat is most probably kazakh too
>
> but i will keep digging on this
> & on whether rayons have governors or whatever
> for it might be better to write to a known
> responsible individual
> rather than to some unknown office or generic place
> i completely agree
> if that is what you were getting at
>
>
> & back to the maybeclaves answer
>
> i wouldnt & dont put too fine a point on any of this
>
> of course a clave heard from much more recently is
> far more
> likely to still exist than a clave heard from much
> less recently
>
>
> interestingly
> this isnt quite the same situation as with
> multipoints
> which
> tho they may move about or get remonumented etc
> nevertheless they presumptively continue to exist
> indefinitely
> or at least as long as their constituent states
> continue to exist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>