Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible BNCNMYTWVN 5-Country Reef and Obelisk<br/>
Date: Sep 07, 2004 @ 03:50<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="15262.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15266.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic14050.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="15263.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="15265.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1537616242">Each theory is as good as the other.<br/>
<br/>
Do we know for fact that the lighthouse or navigation beacon was Malaysian, or<br/>
is that theory too?<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 1:47 PM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible BNCNMYTWVN 5-Country Reef and Obelisk<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; well no need to postulate a greater mystery in order to solve a<br/>
&gt; lesser one<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & i think a single 5country obelisk in the sea is plenty for the time<br/>
&gt; being<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; the so called lighthouse or beacon<br/>
&gt; whether it was mounted atop the obelisk or not<br/>
&gt; could easily have just been a small reflector or glow type<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; the lawn of my estate here on cream hill is littered with solar<br/>
&gt; powered night lights comprised of 6inch plastic cubes that just<br/>
&gt; stick into the ground<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & the 2 blocklike forms you have spotted on the reef could easily<br/>
&gt; have come from the top of the single known obelisk<br/>
&gt; the height of which does indeed appear to have been reduced<br/>
&gt; as detailed below<br/>
&gt; by the necessary 15 or 20 percent to account for them<br/>
&gt; give or take a beacon<br/>
&gt; & were perhaps shot down by the same chinese gunboat that<br/>
&gt; perhaps shot out the light<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; leaving stone markers to claim sovereignty over islets<br/>
&gt; &or destroying such markers to deny it<br/>
&gt; has been a fixture thruout the china seas since 1895<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; after malaysia destroyed the chinese marker here<br/>
&gt; it seems to me<br/>
&gt; the least china could have done was destroy the malaysian light<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; anyway so little for my theory </span></blockquote></div>