ok thanx
so now that we have heard them all
the gods do say
both
that there really were 2 slightly different regimes in effect on
opposite sides of the rocky crest between 1908 & 1925
&
that it really was because gb&us were just there & then
completing the upgrade of their demarcation diligence to the
level of intervisibility
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> I have found the 1908 treaty since writing my message below.
It is at
> http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/en/cus.1908.299.en.html
.
>
> All "Canado-american" boundary treaties are on-line at
> http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_13_en.html .
> All agreements on "boundary waters" are at
> http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_6_en.html .
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:46 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible to have land in USA that
isn't in a State?
>
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
McManus"
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > The original documents almost always clarify the
> > commentaries.
> >
> > good point
> >
> > & why consult the bible if you can read god
> >
> > so can you dish up the 1908 text like that too