Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible to have land in USA that isn&#39;t in a State?<br/>
Date: Jul 31, 2004 @ 03:03<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="14888.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14895.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic14709.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="14889.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14891.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1004174471">I have found the 1908 treaty since writing my message below.  It is at<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/en/cus.1908.299.en.html">http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/en/cus.1908.299.en.html</a> .<br/>
<br/>
All &quot;Canado-american&quot; boundary treaties are on-line at<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_13_en.html">http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_13_en.html</a> .<br/>
All agreements on &quot;boundary waters&quot; are at<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_6_en.html">http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ca_us/s_6_en.html</a> .<br/>
<br/>
Enjoy!<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:46 PM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Possible to have land in USA that isn&#39;t in a State?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot;<br/>
&gt; &lt;mcmanus71496@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; The original documents almost always clarify the<br/>
&gt; commentaries.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; good point<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & why consult the bible if you can read god<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so can you dish up the 1908 text like that too </span></blockquote></div>