Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Bar divided betw. US + CA
Date: Mar 21, 2004 @ 04:33
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Exactly true; truly exact.

--- m06079 <barbaria_longa@...> wrote:
> you are right because you are here mike
>
> but here or anywhere
> anyone who gets pissed off does so at their own risk
> & expense
>
> it is not part of the program here
> even in our new improved format
>
> truth is still beauty & beauty is still truth
>
> i cant & wouldnt change that
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > I think people use "you said," "he said," "I
> said," to
> > shed light on what is currently being said. Not
> so
> > much for pissing off but more for coming to
> understand
> > truth. But I can recall several times there have
> been
> > much more vigorous message sequences than this.
> > Although they may predate your entrance to this
> group
> > (I am not sure when that was).
> > But what is it you wish to know about these 4
> > occupation zones? I see Jesper just linked a good
> > map.
> > I have no idea about unsubscribing, at least no
> idea
> > why it did not work for you.
> >
> > --- Carl Schubbe <turtle5003@a...> wrote:
> > > Dear Mr. Kaufman:
> > >
> > > Please help me out here. I cannot understand why
> so
> > > often BoundaryPoint
> > > members appear to become *pissed off* toward
> other
> > > members. I can't recall
> > > reading, in any of the other groups to which I
> > > belong, so many "you said,"
> > > "he said," "I said," etc. And all for what
> *serious*
> > > reason.?
> > >
> > > When I joined BP, I was hoping to gain as
> specific
> > > information as possible
> > > regarding the four zones of post war
> occupation.
> > >
> > > I received not a *single* response. Nada.
> > >
> > > I am very much wanting out of this group. But
> try as
> > > I might, I have been
> > > unsuccessful, despite my having followed the
> > > *unsubscribe* link as posted.
> > >
> > > I would appreciate any help you might suggest
> toward
> > > achieving this purpose.
> > >
> > > Thankyou
> > >
> > > turtle5003@a...
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Kaufman" <mikekaufman79@y...>
> > > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:25 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Bar divided
> betw.
> > > US + CA
> > >
> > >
> > > > Again, you misread and miscomprehend me.
> Where
> > > did I
> > > > put a 2 week limit on anything? Please point
> this
> > > out
> > > > as I never put this limit there. For some odd
> > > reason,
> > > > you keep speaking of this as though I have.
> > > Second,
> > > > reality is to my liking, as is the reality is
> that
> > > my
> > > > trip does not necessitate 10,000 miles. Or
> 9500
> > > > miles. Or 11,000 miles. etc etc etc. If you
> > > would
> > > > like to plan a trip that does take 10,000
> miles
> > > that
> > > > is fine. No one is stopping you. In fact I'd
> > > enjoy
> > > > seeing your plan of one. But that does not
> > > concern
> > > > the itinerary I personally came up with. You
> may
> > > > enjoy driving random roads from the start to
> > > finish,
> > > > but if you wish to do so, you should account
> for
> > > the
> > > > distances in your own trip, not force them
> into
> > > > someone elses. Perhaps you could plan a
> GNASTP
> > > (Great
> > > > North American Serendipitous Tripointing
> > > > Peregrination) which would include thousands
> of
> > > miles
> > > > of allowances for driving roads from start to
> > > finish.
> > > > But that is not applicable here.
> > > > Also, I do feel good, as I hope you do too. I
> use
> > > > emphasis to point out where you are
> > > misunderstanding
> > > > me, since it seems you quite often do. And I
> > > think
> > > > that perhaps it is you who should take a bp
> break
> > > > until you stop calling people "jerks" if they
> > > happen
> > > > to bring up a topic which rankles you.
> > > >
> > > > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > > > first of all mike
> > > > > nothing is more important than that you feel
> > > good
> > > > >
> > > > > so for starters
> > > > > please leave your problems & your shouting
> > > somewhere
> > > > > else
> > > > >
> > > > > & be sure to come back here as soon as you
> are
> > > > > feeling better
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > puzzles we got
> > > > >
> > > > > problems not
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > secondly
> > > > > the reason i thought you didnt disallow
> peters &
> > > > > dougs stops is
> > > > > that you did explicitly disallow all my own
> > > > > suggested stops below
> > > > > but not any of the others
> > > > > so far as i could tell
> > > > >
> > > > > so i figured
> > > > > if you meant to disallow the others too
> > > > > then you would have said so too
> > > > >
> > > > > & now that you have said so
> > > > > i do understand
> > > > >
> > > > > you arent discounting them
> > > > >
> > > > > you are simply not counting them
> > > > >
> > > > > but mine you are actually discounting as
> well as
> > > not
> > > > > counting
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > so this is finally
> > > > > exclusively & entirely
> > > > > your own private itinerary that you are
> > > measuring up
> > > > >
> > > > > i agree to that
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > & i also agree you should measure it exactly
> > > however
> > > > > you like
> > > > > & should certainly ignore me & reality too
> > > > > & particularly all the others who think 2
> weeks
> > > isnt
> > > > > enough time
> > > > > for alaska & new brunswick in any case
> whatever
> > > the
> > > > > mileage
> > > > > especially if thinking about us gets you
> > > > > disconnected from who
> > > > > you really are
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > thats right
> > > > >
> > > > > unless reality is entirely to your liking
> > > > > i say ignore it in favor of your dreams
> > > > >
> > > > > & i will be with you 100 percent if you
> should
> > > do
> > > > > that
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > thirdly
> > > > > i havent been directing & am not directing
> > > anything
> > > > > at you
> > > > > but have only been talking to you
> > > > > & addressing what i thought you meant
> > > > > just as i am also addressing now what i
> think
> > > you
> > > > > mean now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > & in my view
> > > > > you are fine
> > > > > & indeed divine
> > > > > whatever you mean
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html