Subject: Re: Bar divided betw. US + CA
Date: Mar 21, 2004 @ 03:23
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


you are right because you are here mike

but here or anywhere
anyone who gets pissed off does so at their own risk & expense

it is not part of the program here
even in our new improved format

truth is still beauty & beauty is still truth

i cant & wouldnt change that

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
<mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> I think people use "you said," "he said," "I said," to
> shed light on what is currently being said. Not so
> much for pissing off but more for coming to understand
> truth. But I can recall several times there have been
> much more vigorous message sequences than this.
> Although they may predate your entrance to this group
> (I am not sure when that was).
> But what is it you wish to know about these 4
> occupation zones? I see Jesper just linked a good
> map.
> I have no idea about unsubscribing, at least no idea
> why it did not work for you.
>
> --- Carl Schubbe <turtle5003@a...> wrote:
> > Dear Mr. Kaufman:
> >
> > Please help me out here. I cannot understand why so
> > often BoundaryPoint
> > members appear to become *pissed off* toward other
> > members. I can't recall
> > reading, in any of the other groups to which I
> > belong, so many "you said,"
> > "he said," "I said," etc. And all for what *serious*
> > reason.?
> >
> > When I joined BP, I was hoping to gain as specific
> > information as possible
> > regarding the four zones of post war occupation.
> >
> > I received not a *single* response. Nada.
> >
> > I am very much wanting out of this group. But try as
> > I might, I have been
> > unsuccessful, despite my having followed the
> > *unsubscribe* link as posted.
> >
> > I would appreciate any help you might suggest toward
> > achieving this purpose.
> >
> > Thankyou
> >
> > turtle5003@a...
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Kaufman" <mikekaufman79@y...>
> > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Bar divided betw.
> > US + CA
> >
> >
> > > Again, you misread and miscomprehend me. Where
> > did I
> > > put a 2 week limit on anything? Please point this
> > out
> > > as I never put this limit there. For some odd
> > reason,
> > > you keep speaking of this as though I have.
> > Second,
> > > reality is to my liking, as is the reality is that
> > my
> > > trip does not necessitate 10,000 miles. Or 9500
> > > miles. Or 11,000 miles. etc etc etc. If you
> > would
> > > like to plan a trip that does take 10,000 miles
> > that
> > > is fine. No one is stopping you. In fact I'd
> > enjoy
> > > seeing your plan of one. But that does not
> > concern
> > > the itinerary I personally came up with. You may
> > > enjoy driving random roads from the start to
> > finish,
> > > but if you wish to do so, you should account for
> > the
> > > distances in your own trip, not force them into
> > > someone elses. Perhaps you could plan a GNASTP
> > (Great
> > > North American Serendipitous Tripointing
> > > Peregrination) which would include thousands of
> > miles
> > > of allowances for driving roads from start to
> > finish.
> > > But that is not applicable here.
> > > Also, I do feel good, as I hope you do too. I use
> > > emphasis to point out where you are
> > misunderstanding
> > > me, since it seems you quite often do. And I
> > think
> > > that perhaps it is you who should take a bp break
> > > until you stop calling people "jerks" if they
> > happen
> > > to bring up a topic which rankles you.
> > >
> > > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > > first of all mike
> > > > nothing is more important than that you feel
> > good
> > > >
> > > > so for starters
> > > > please leave your problems & your shouting
> > somewhere
> > > > else
> > > >
> > > > & be sure to come back here as soon as you are
> > > > feeling better
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > puzzles we got
> > > >
> > > > problems not
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > secondly
> > > > the reason i thought you didnt disallow peters &
> > > > dougs stops is
> > > > that you did explicitly disallow all my own
> > > > suggested stops below
> > > > but not any of the others
> > > > so far as i could tell
> > > >
> > > > so i figured
> > > > if you meant to disallow the others too
> > > > then you would have said so too
> > > >
> > > > & now that you have said so
> > > > i do understand
> > > >
> > > > you arent discounting them
> > > >
> > > > you are simply not counting them
> > > >
> > > > but mine you are actually discounting as well as
> > not
> > > > counting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so this is finally
> > > > exclusively & entirely
> > > > your own private itinerary that you are
> > measuring up
> > > >
> > > > i agree to that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & i also agree you should measure it exactly
> > however
> > > > you like
> > > > & should certainly ignore me & reality too
> > > > & particularly all the others who think 2 weeks
> > isnt
> > > > enough time
> > > > for alaska & new brunswick in any case whatever
> > the
> > > > mileage
> > > > especially if thinking about us gets you
> > > > disconnected from who
> > > > you really are
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > thats right
> > > >
> > > > unless reality is entirely to your liking
> > > > i say ignore it in favor of your dreams
> > > >
> > > > & i will be with you 100 percent if you should
> > do
> > > > that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > thirdly
> > > > i havent been directing & am not directing
> > anything
> > > > at you
> > > > but have only been talking to you
> > > > & addressing what i thought you meant
> > > > just as i am also addressing now what i think
> > you
> > > > mean now
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & in my view
> > > > you are fine
> > > > & indeed divine
> > > > whatever you mean