Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundaries through urban areas
Date: Nov 02, 2003 @ 14:34
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


you are right.

end of discussion

jesper
----- Original Message -----
From: "acroorca2002" <orc@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundaries through urban areas


> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
> <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > buildings under borders
> >
> > Tunnels should qualify. We have two railway tunnels and one
> highway tunnel
> > under the CAUS boundary, and one railway tunnel under the
> MXUS boundary. Of
> > course, international tunnels are more common in the Alps
> and Andes.
> >
> > Lowell G. McManus
> > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 9:28 AM
> > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundaries through urban areas
> >
> >
> > > search & enjoy
> > >
> > > real success is when your compass gets stuck on happy
> > > no matter what you may or may not find
> > >
> > > & now we have a whole new rarity or nullity to look for
> > >
> > > buildings under borders
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> > > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > > I visited the divided structure on the Copenhagen
> > > City-Copenhagen County
> > > > lines yesterday comming from work, but there is nothing
> there.
> > > >
> > > > It's definately not an overground building. Such a
> > > dissapointment.
> > > >
> > > > I like the idea of a roofed multipoint, something new to look
> for.
> > > >
> > > > Jesper
> > > > >
> > > > > They just published a 1:4000 of Copenhagen
> > > City/Frederiksberg counties,
> > > > and
> > > > > I found a divided building
>
> yes jesper & lowell
> & the next step in this staged dilution & aeration & diffusion of
> our focal topic
> & our retrogression
> from the actually nonexistent
> to the truly unique
> to the merely rare
> to the admittedly common
> to the frankly ubiquitous
> would naturally be sea lanes over borders
> & finally air lanes over borders
> & space shots over borders
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>