Subject: Re: Boundaries through urban areas
Date: Nov 02, 2003 @ 13:43
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > buildings under borders
>
> Tunnels should qualify. We have two railway tunnels and one
highway tunnel
> under the CAUS boundary, and one railway tunnel under the
MXUS boundary. Of
> course, international tunnels are more common in the Alps
and Andes.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 9:28 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Boundaries through urban areas
>
>
> > search & enjoy
> >
> > real success is when your compass gets stuck on happy
> > no matter what you may or may not find
> >
> > & now we have a whole new rarity or nullity to look for
> >
> > buildings under borders
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > I visited the divided structure on the Copenhagen
> > City-Copenhagen County
> > > lines yesterday comming from work, but there is nothing
there.
> > >
> > > It's definately not an overground building. Such a
> > dissapointment.
> > >
> > > I like the idea of a roofed multipoint, something new to look
for.
> > >
> > > Jesper
> > > >
> > > > They just published a 1:4000 of Copenhagen
> > City/Frederiksberg counties,
> > > and
> > > > I found a divided building

yes jesper & lowell
& the next step in this staged dilution & aeration & diffusion of
our focal topic
& our retrogression
from the actually nonexistent
to the truly unique
to the merely rare
to the admittedly common
to the frankly ubiquitous
would naturally be sea lanes over borders
& finally air lanes over borders
& space shots over borders