- Fw: UWE PRESS RELEASE
... Kennard, Ann Head of German Chair of Bristol-Hannover Council Email: Ann.Kennard@uwe.ac.uk Tel.No: 0117 344 2263 University of the West of England
May 22, 2002 @ 16:27 - Doug Murray ("Doug Murray" <doug@...>)
- whats wrong with this picture
http://www.dcdar.org/boundary_stones_loc.htm#nw1 encore http://www.enlou.com/markers/intntlboundarymarker.htm m
May 22, 2002 @ 17:28 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] whats wrong with this picture
My eyes are dim... I cannot see... Sheesh. Let s send em a camera! Doug ... From: acroorca2002 To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 22,
May 23, 2002 @ 00:16 - Doug Murray ("Doug Murray" <doug@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
hahaha right you are those were the most botched whats wrong with this picture pictures ever shown the correct answers had there been any would have been first
May 23, 2002 @ 12:26 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- whats wrong with this picture
here complete at last & all in one message for the first time since the discussion about the unilateral multiplication of texas began in case anybody has been
Jan 14, 2004 @ 17:37 - Michael Donner ("Michael Donner" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] whats wrong with this picture
Mike, I ve explained this until I m blue in the face, and I m not the only one! Perhaps you missed something during your peregrinations. The prevailing Texas
Jan 14, 2004 @ 19:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
perhaps you missed something during my peregrinations too lowell & i agree you are looking blue in the face but you still havent said whats wrong you only say
Jan 14, 2004 @ 22:01 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
perhaps you missed something during my peregrinations too lowell & i agree you are looking blue in the face but you still havent said whats wrong you only say
Jan 14, 2004 @ 22:04 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] whats wrong with this picture
sufficient population - So what number of people qualifies as sufficient? ... here complete at last & all in one message for the first time since the
Jan 15, 2004 @ 01:54 - Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: whats wrong with this picture
Mike, I ve stated repeatedly what I find wrong with the picture that appears to Van Zandt. You have every right to disagree with my view, but is there so
Jan 15, 2004 @ 07:21 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
... that appears to Van ... so much ... from my writings ... yes my friend i can tell you have a view & vive la difference but i am still trying to
Jan 15, 2004 @ 19:45 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
... sufficient? That was not stated. In the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Confederation Congress (prior to the ratification of the federal Constitution) had
Jan 15, 2004 @ 21:03 - lowellgmcmanus ("lowellgmcmanus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: whats wrong with this picture
Mike, I am shaking my head yes and no at the same time. (If you wanted to know the specific words to which I object, why didn t you just ask?) I disagree with
Jan 16, 2004 @ 04:20 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
... didn t you just ... & i am still shaking my head in disbelief over this question hahahahaha but what makes you think i didnt ask yikes really this is
Jan 16, 2004 @ 16:55 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
in fairness to both tennessee & texas & you lowell i should add it took west north carolina 6 years to get this erection in the first place under all manner of
Jan 16, 2004 @ 20:52 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: whats wrong with this picture
Mike, My response to your initial mention of Tennessee was written yesterday morning before you had acknowledged in the message below that it was a delayed
Jan 17, 2004 @ 23:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: whats wrong with this picture
... yesterday morning ... a delayed flake ... hovered in the ... making it look ... would have ... President, or ... of Texas into ... curious legal ... as a
Jan 20, 2004 @ 20:35 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)