1. re recent dc & pr questions
    anton especially but not only this is probably not necessary since i promised to get back to you only if i was mistaken about the retrocession by the usa of
    Oct 20, 2001 @ 18:26 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  2. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    ... the most ... islands ... Woops, I must have missed that thread (a symptom of my drop-in-and- browse link to this group, sorry). I m just compiling a list
    Oct 20, 2001 @ 18:40 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    ... not to worry yes wonderful this is right on it appears there is no definitive usgovt mapping to settle all this but the laws do specify 9nm & 3nm as
    Oct 20, 2001 @ 19:32 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  4. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    ... terms of any ... territorial sea ... Ah, gotcha. My mistake - the blurred quadripoint is way farther out, between US Virgins, UK Virgins, Anguilla and
    Oct 20, 2001 @ 20:19 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] re recent dc & pr questions
    ... [...] ... thanks. and do you know why? ... [...] ... including Wyoming? -- Anton Sherwood
    Oct 21, 2001 @ 07:45 - Anton Sherwood (Anton Sherwood <bronto@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] re recent dc & pr questions
    from anton ... ah yes wyoming well i am like grant sometimes the mental maps never reach the ground & sometimes mine dont even know what i am saying also about
    Oct 21, 2001 @ 21:28 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  7. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    ... i believe it was always a sort of back lot & never really got developed anything like the left bank did so eventually congress voted to give it back to
    Nov 23, 2001 @ 06:26 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  8. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    There were two retrocessions one large, one more recent and really small - I have the texts of the laws placing this into effect - if anyone wants to see
    Nov 23, 2001 @ 16:23 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  9. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    yes len & major thanx for this & at least another dose of detail here on principal speaking for at least several interested parties present the only second
    Nov 23, 2001 @ 18:06 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  10. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    I ll have to dig into this further, but my initial take on this is that the second retrocession I mentioned did not involve the pierheads as the 1945 Act
    Nov 23, 2001 @ 20:13 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  11. Re: re recent dc & pr questions
    ... just so & i am pretty sure i was able to use the pierhead alignment as recently as about 1998 for what is probably still the only class b visit ever made
    Nov 24, 2001 @ 04:28 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)