1. delaware fires back
    http://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/local/2005/02/15delawarefiresba.html yikes the 1934 & 1935 supreme court decisions are under review by nj now too
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 15:18 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] delaware fires back
    There are, of course two questions at issue between Delaware and New Jersey. One is whether Delaware should or should not allow the construction of the pier
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 16:52 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  3. Re: delaware fires back
    wowwww hahahahaha & that covers the fudge job forever too hahahahahaha for it means nobody ever including ourselves now can legally discuss & dispute the
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 17:27 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: delaware fires back
    I think we re all safe so long as we seek the Court s reasoning without disputing their finding. By the way, Delaware was similarly enjoined vis-à-vis New
    Feb 15, 2005 @ 18:34 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  5. Re: delaware fires back
    hahahahaha & just when i find something i really would like to dispute at last but of course we are all safe in any case so long as we are having fun ...
    Feb 16, 2005 @ 19:28 - aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: delaware fires back
    yikes i have to correct myself i would not really like to dispute even this supreme idiocy & i wouldnt even like to dispute the idea that i cant legally
    Feb 16, 2005 @ 20:29 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)