I think we're all safe so long as we seek the Court's reasoning without
disputing their finding.
By the way, Delaware was similarly enjoined vis-à-vis New Jersey.
Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: delaware fires back
>
>
> wowwww
> hahahahaha
> & that covers the fudge job forever too
> hahahahahaha
> for it means nobody ever
> including ourselves now
> can legally discuss & dispute the correctness of their judgments
> since we must be included in what they refer to here as
> all other persons
> are perpetually enjoined
>
> so we are all probably already wanted by the fbi
> hahahahaha
> whoooops
> yet here is a case already sufficiently hilarious that i would enjoin
> you all to disregard their injunction anyway & continue to try to get
> to the bottom of the truth behind this crazy arc & now this crazy
> law as well
> under the special dispensation of the unalienable divine right to
> pursue happiness clause in the declaration of independence
>
> yikes
> & i called it a cover up job
> didnt i
>
> indeed i have been wanting to test the legal validity of our
> declarational rights for some time
>
> & what better test of them to bring before the court
>
> for we know many bum laws are fully constitutional but
> undeclarational
> indeed antideclarational
>
> so lets keep boogying nonstop on this one for sure
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
> <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
>> There are, of course two questions at issue between Delaware
> and New Jersey.
>> One is whether Delaware should or should not allow the
> construction of the pier
>> extending into its sovereign waters. New Jersey politicians
> can argue that one
>> to their heart's content, but it's still Delaware's decision to
> make. The other
>> question is whether the boundary should even be where it is.
> When New Jersey
>> politicians rant about that, they are in violation of the following
> 1935 US
>> Supreme Court injunction:
>>
>> ..the state of New Jersey, its officers, agents, and
> representatives,
>> sentatives, its citizens and all other persons are perpetually
> enjoined from
>> disputing the sovereignty, jurisdiction, and dominion of the
> state of Delaware
>> over the territory adjudged to the state of Delaware by this
> decree.
>>
>> Such violation constitutes contempt under 21 USC 401, which
> the court may punish
>> "by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion." Yikes,
> indeed!
>>
>> Lowell G. McManus
>> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@y...>
>> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:18 AM
>> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] delaware fires back
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
> http://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/local/2005/02/15del
> awarefiresba.html
>> >
>> > yikes
>> > the 1934 & 1935 supreme court decisions are under
>> > review by nj now too
>> >
>> > wonder if they will button up when they find the
>> > mistake was in their favor
>> > hahaha
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > & i also have to wonder
>> > did these decisions freeze the boundary in 1935
>> > or is it still subject to wander about with accretions
>> > to the mean low water line
>> > as one might otherwise expect
>> >
>> > for if you compare the present topos
>> > especially in the denjpa vicinity
>> > where the cumulative accretion of the mean low water
>> > line is most extreme
>> > as indicated by the dotted tidal flats here
>> >
> http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=4405613&e=46483
> 6
>> > to the pre1934 topos
>> > for example
>> >
> http://historical.maptech.com/getImage.cfm?fname=cstr98sw.jp
> g&state=PA
>> > you will see that the tidal flats have moved about
>> > quite a bit
>> > & have specifically advanced quite some distance
>> > toward denjpa from the arc terminus that was set at
>> > the mean low water mark in 1934 or 1935
>> > then only 450 feet from marker 1
>> > as compared to about 4 times that distance here on the
>> > latest topo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > __________________________________
>> > Do you Yahoo!?
>> > Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
>> > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>