1. PRVI
    ... I, also, assume that this remains undone, but I can tell you exactly how it would be done. The first paragraph of Article 12 of the Convention on the
    Dec 16, 2003 @ 03:50 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  2. Re: PRVI
    ... figuring ... with ... exactly how it ... yes i think this is exactly how it would be done if pr & vi were independent countries but this is an internal
    Dec 16, 2003 @ 17:12 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: PRVI
    Mike, Even though the Convention on the Contiguous Zone, etc. was intended for international boundaries, it has been officially anointed by the Supremes as
    Dec 17, 2003 @ 04:54 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  4. Re: PRVI
    ... intended for ... Supremes as ... boundaries. ... have not ... claims; but if ... to American ... would be ... claims? Is the ... cant definitely answer
    Dec 17, 2003 @ 16:30 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: PRVI
    The Submerged Lands Act says that it applies to any State of the Union. Federal law at 48 U.S.C. 749 (in the title on Territories and Insular Possessions )
    Dec 17, 2003 @ 19:27 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  6. Re: PRVI
    ... Union. ... Insular ... of the ... the ... to ... was the day ... the purchase ... of Puerto ... are Danish. ... covered ... and ... be, ... thereof. ...
    Dec 17, 2003 @ 20:51 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)