1. Adjustment of 1912
    The adjustment of 1912 appears to be a vertical datum correction that affected benchmarks all over the country, not just in the greater MN-ND-SD area, so I
    Jul 17, 2003 @ 01:03 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  2. Re: Adjustment of 1912
    ... correction ... greater ... year in ... ok right this is a misidentification of what i meant which as i say has been eluding rediscovery perhaps more to the
    Jul 17, 2003 @ 03:04 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  3. Re: Adjustment of 1912
    I don t really know what kind of rechanneling might take place during a major flood, so I suppose a natural avulsion could have taken place between 1862 and
    Jul 17, 2003 @ 11:08 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
  4. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Adjustment of 1912
    Brian & Mike, I have been following this extended discourse on finding the truth about MN-ND-SD, and am naturally very interested in the outcome.
    Jul 17, 2003 @ 21:25 - jack parsell ("jack parsell" <jparsell@...>)
  5. tripoint adjustments Re: Adjustment of 1912
    thanx jack & glad you are with us & what do you think of the new mdvawv probability i am preparing to make a fresh try there during the next prolonged drop in
    Jul 18, 2003 @ 15:29 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  6. RE: mdvawv
    One time when Joyce and I were there the water was very low, but of course all we had for reference points were the State signs by the highway and where the
    Jul 18, 2003 @ 20:09 - jparsell ("jparsell" <jparsell@...>)
  7. Re: mdvawv
    wonderful it would be an honor & a pleasure & i will keep you posted onlist in hopes others will join us too lets give it at least a few more weeks to dry out
    Jul 19, 2003 @ 10:26 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)