Subject: Re: American State Boundaries
Date: May 07, 2003 @ 13:52
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> How does your reply square with what CNN wrote in its reporton the
> Supreme Court case from the end of May 03 where it stated:on must
>
> "As a result, most of the island in New York Harbor from now
> be considered Ellis Island, New Jersey"?Sumpreme Court
>
> I agree the Feds don't have a mini-DC there, but the
> only said, apparently, that the Feds don't have the right to alterthe
> border of two states at that point. Does the dispute go on?<flynnk@r...> wrote:
>
> LN
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Flynn, Kevin"
> > Ellis Island, while owned by the federal government, is notfederal
> > territory with a boundary to be established. The 3-acre +/-original
> islandwaters, is NJ.
> > is NY and the infill surrounding area, and surrounding
> ><orc@o...> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: L. A. Nadybal [mailto:lnadybal@c...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 8:15 PM
> > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: American State Boundaries
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"
> > > in reply to craig:present
> >
> > >"it is noteworthy that the ellis island njny loop was originally
> > >fractal but since it is based today on a former rather than the
> > >shoreline the supreme court adjudicator or special masterwas forced to
> > >rationalize the line into a series of plotted points"about
> >
> > That wouldn't come into play as an aswer to the question
> > "interstate" boundaries, because the part of Ellis Island thatis
> > federal would make it the second place within the countrythat is not
> > a part of any state. For that reason, we couldn't consider theDC-VA
> > border in trying to answer the question. There's got to be atripoint
> > at one place on the perimiter of the federal portion of Ellisisland
> > and another at some other location on the perimiter fromwhich the
> > joint border continues anew. NJ-NY will not have a commonborder
> > where the federal portion interrupts.Court
> >
> > And, to close off with the "but..." question? Did the Supreme
> > actually say that the plot of federal land on the island is notpart
> > of either state or did the court do a "favorite" and leave things
> > ambiguous by saying only that neither state had jurisdiction?
> >
> > LN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/