Subject: Re: American State Boundaries
Date: May 07, 2003 @ 12:32
Author: L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


How does your reply square with what CNN wrote in its report on the
Supreme Court case from the end of May 03 where it stated:

"As a result, most of the island in New York Harbor from now on must
be considered Ellis Island, New Jersey"?

I agree the Feds don't have a mini-DC there, but the Sumpreme Court
only said, apparently, that the Feds don't have the right to alter the
border of two states at that point. Does the dispute go on?

LN



--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@r...> wrote:
> Ellis Island, while owned by the federal government, is not federal
> territory with a boundary to be established. The 3-acre +/- original
island
> is NY and the infill surrounding area, and surrounding waters, is NJ.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. A. Nadybal [mailto:lnadybal@c...]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 8:15 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: American State Boundaries
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002" <orc@o...> wrote:
> > in reply to craig:
>
> >"it is noteworthy that the ellis island njny loop was originally
> >fractal but since it is based today on a former rather than the present
> >shoreline the supreme court adjudicator or special master was forced to
> >rationalize the line into a series of plotted points"
>
> That wouldn't come into play as an aswer to the question about
> "interstate" boundaries, because the part of Ellis Island that is
> federal would make it the second place within the country that is not
> a part of any state. For that reason, we couldn't consider the DC-VA
> border in trying to answer the question. There's got to be a tripoint
> at one place on the perimiter of the federal portion of Ellis island
> and another at some other location on the perimiter from which the
> joint border continues anew. NJ-NY will not have a common border
> where the federal portion interrupts.
>
> And, to close off with the "but..." question? Did the Supreme Court
> actually say that the plot of federal land on the island is not part
> of either state or did the court do a "favorite" and leave things
> ambiguous by saying only that neither state had jurisdiction?
>
> LN
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/