Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: For Mike D: Multipointing
Date: Oct 13, 2002 @ 19:36
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: acroorca2002Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 8:27 PMSubject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: For Mike D: Multipointingyes dear jesper
great question & yes i do recognize non class a visits as true
multipoint visits
since the word visit just means go to see
so just effectively eyeballing the multipoint
from any distance
which also embraces as you know class b & c & d too
rather than necessarily persevering by whatever means
necessary to physically occupy & thus absolutely touch the point
class a
are all in my view also very distinguished levels of going to see
but i think even a class e visit
meaning just an earnest try &or best guess for the elusive truth
while not necessarily a true visit at all strictly speaking
is nevertheless still perhaps equally worthy of recognition
thus to pick perhaps the best possible examples in the world
i would recognize all 20 of rolfs & all 20 of peters world class
multipoint tries as being equally & homogeneously worthy of
recognition as true visits
or at least as relatively successful tries
since i believe it is only the sincerity of the try that really matters
anyway
& not necessarily the degree of the actual success at all
but anyway what do you &or others recognize
maybe we should create an olympic committee
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> Dear Mike
>
> Do you recognize non class a visits as a multipoint visit?
>
> Jesper
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.