Subject: Re: For Mike D: Multipointing
Date: Apr 13, 2003 @ 18:27
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


yes dear jesper
great question & yes i do recognize non class a visits as true
multipoint visits
since the word visit just means go to see

so just effectively eyeballing the multipoint
from any distance
which also embraces as you know class b & c & d too
rather than necessarily persevering by whatever means
necessary to physically occupy & thus absolutely touch the point
class a
are all in my view also very distinguished levels of going to see

but i think even a class e visit
meaning just an earnest try &or best guess for the elusive truth
while not necessarily a true visit at all strictly speaking
is nevertheless still perhaps equally worthy of recognition

thus to pick perhaps the best possible examples in the world
i would recognize all 20 of rolfs & all 20 of peters world class
multipoint tries as being equally & homogeneously worthy of
recognition as true visits
or at least as relatively successful tries
since i believe it is only the sincerity of the try that really matters
anyway
& not necessarily the degree of the actual success at all

but anyway what do you &or others recognize

maybe we should create an olympic committee

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> Dear Mike
>
> Do you recognize non class a visits as a multipoint visit?
>
> Jesper