--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> Personally, I count all of my 19 tripoints even though at least 3
is doubtful:
i agree
the class designations are useful only for comparing the various
basic levels of success
but there is no reason to distinguish among these levels when
counting the total number of points tried
thats why i figure rolf & peter are simply tied for gold
at 20
while you are also simply tied for bronze with harry & doug
at 19
without any need to get into hairsplitting or tiebreaking
> 1) ATCHDE - non existant in the first place. And if it were I was
quite far from the expected spot.
as i think gideon at least correctly recognizes
this trijunction is in the legally unresolved or default condition
so an equidistance tripoint remains the leading probability
& is a matter of simple computation
for which i think he also provides the correct solution
unless & until contradicted by some actual agreement to the
contrary
but regardless
your try was in earnest whatever it was
so it counts as a point tried imo
also i think it is a good thing that there still remains somewhere
to go for future tries or for future generations
both on this point & on the 2 following points you mention below
tho i dont agree that a disputed tripoint position amounts to the
same thing as a triline
rather a disputed position simply means a split point
& so naturally you get a bonus try in that case
& no loss or diffusion of anything really
tho it only counts as a single trijunction
but you could still bag both halves of such a split point
class a & class a
for a combined class aa visit i suppose
also i am glad to learn you are still aiming at so many as 5 of the
baltic tripoints
& that so many as 4 of these remain unsettled
& i expect this will make of it the most challenging eebie to date
particularly in view of the great distances & primitive conditions
> 2) HRHUSI - not officially disputed (as far as I can figure out),
but is not at the same spot on HR and SI official post 1991
maps. The area quite in accesible and would require much
more time and effort.
>
> 3) HRHUYU - Again two different version dependant of who you
asked. We tried HRHUYU(YU) and ended up 500 meters from
the spot, before we were wanted to go any longer. Anyway the
former Yugoslavian side of the border is disputed between HR
and YU and you could call it a triline.
>
> On GBBE we have 5 new tripoints, but only 1 is so far settled:
BYLTLV, making one 1 true class a possible.
>
> Jesper
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: acroorca2002
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 8:27 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: For Mike D: Multipointing
>
>
> yes dear jesper
> great question & yes i do recognize non class a visits as true
> multipoint visits
> since the word visit just means go to see
>
> so just effectively eyeballing the multipoint
> from any distance
> which also embraces as you know class b & c & d too
> rather than necessarily persevering by whatever means
> necessary to physically occupy & thus absolutely touch the
point
> class a
> are all in my view also very distinguished levels of going to
see
>
> but i think even a class e visit
> meaning just an earnest try &or best guess for the elusive
truth
> while not necessarily a true visit at all strictly speaking
> is nevertheless still perhaps equally worthy of recognition
>
> thus to pick perhaps the best possible examples in the world
> i would recognize all 20 of rolfs & all 20 of peters world class
> multipoint tries as being equally & homogeneously worthy of
> recognition as true visits
> or at least as relatively successful tries
> since i believe it is only the sincerity of the try that really
matters
> anyway
> & not necessarily the degree of the actual success at all
>
> but anyway what do you &or others recognize
>
> maybe we should create an olympic committee
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > Dear Mike
> >
> > Do you recognize non class a visits as a multipoint visit?
> >
> > Jesper
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.