Subject: iqsa & kwsa not neutral but condominial<br/>
Date: Apr 05, 2003 @ 18:01<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9592.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9598.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9531.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9593.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9595.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1359900087">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Kevin Meynell <br/>
&lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt;The Saudi-Kuwait neutral zone was established<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; What was the situation with the former Saudi-Iraq neutral zone, <br/>
 </span></blockquote>which even <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; had its own country code designator?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>both of these supposedly neutral zones werent neutral at all <br/>
but rather condominial<br/>
since they were jointly exploited <br/>
rather than mutually vacated or avoided<br/>
<br/>
truly neutral zones are basically off limits to both parties & of no <br/>
use to either or both except as a buffer between them</div>