Subject: Re: particular mexican spots<br/>
Date: Jan 24, 2003 @ 15:59<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 &lt;orc@orcoast.com&gt; (&quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8725.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10292.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3532.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8726.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8728.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1841117471">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Arif Samad <br/>
&lt;fHoiberg@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Ok, the CIESIN site I have just sent has maps with<br/>
&gt; thin boundaries, though being a demographic site, one<br/>
&gt; may wonder it can be trusted.  As two quadripoints<br/>
&gt; tries show up as close misses and one quadtripoint try<br/>
&gt; show up as a quadtripoint, I tend to believe that is<br/>
&gt; the case.  If there were a mistake, all three of them<br/>
&gt; would have showed up as either close misses or true<br/>
&gt; quadripoints.  <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>brilliant resourcefulness & excellent reasoning<br/>
& these are actually the best data we have on this treasure<br/>
& great news in fact<br/>
so i am with you loud & clear so far<br/>
tho of course we still want hard evidence<br/>
<br/>
but yoicks why dont we mount an official expedition in the <br/>
meantime</div>