Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: particular mexican spots<br/>
Date: Jan 24, 2003 @ 15:21<br/>
Author: Arif Samad (Arif Samad &lt;fHoiberg@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8723.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8727.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3532.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8724.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8726.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1286062931">Ok, the CIESIN site I have just sent has maps with<br/>
thin boundaries, though being a demographic site, one<br/>
may wonder it can be trusted.  As two quadripoints<br/>
tries show up as close misses and one quadtripoint try<br/>
show up as a quadtripoint, I tend to believe that is<br/>
the case.  If there were a mistake, all three of them<br/>
would have showed up as either close misses or true<br/>
quadripoints.  By the way, if you want to see more<br/>
states, click on all the regions of Mexico you want to<br/>
check out, then click on &quot;Get States&quot; and then check<br/>
the map.  I just click &quot;Zoom In&quot; and zoom as I know<br/>
where the quadtripoints tries are.<br/>
I am not sure I quite agree with Jan about the ice<br/>
being water.  If that is the case, Greenland should<br/>
show up as divided in maps along with much of<br/>
Antarctica.  I don&#39;t quite disagree with it either<br/>
though and am waiting for a consensus.<br/>
Arif<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do you Yahoo!?<br/>
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mailplus.yahoo.com">http://mailplus.yahoo.com</a></div>