Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: particular mexican spots<br/>
Date: Jan 23, 2003 @ 15:47<br/>
Author: Arif Samad (Arif Samad &lt;fHoiberg@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8712.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8719.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3532.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8715.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8717.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1903578424">Since the point seems to have come up again, I have to<br/>
say that I believe my list of Mexican quadripoints is<br/>
quite thorough and there is only one.  It has been in<br/>
my site <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://members.aol.com/marismits/LoclGeo.htm">http://members.aol.com/marismits/LoclGeo.htm</a><br/>
for some time.  I have checked on a few sources<br/>
including encyclopedias and atlases and all of them<br/>
bust the other quadripoint tries convincingly except<br/>
the one on my web page.  The only maps which casts<br/>
doubt on my quadripoint is the the maps-of-Mexico site<br/>
and even that can be explained by way too fat<br/>
boundaries.<br/>
One of my sources, that does not really have clear<br/>
maps but has OK boundaries, is<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://plue.sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/plue/ddviewer/ddv30-USMEX/">http://plue.sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/plue/ddviewer/ddv30-USMEX/</a><br/>
from Ciesin.  This also shows the two other<br/>
quadripoint tries that are close, but is not quiet<br/>
quadripoints.<br/>
Arif<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do you Yahoo!?<br/>
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mailplus.yahoo.com">http://mailplus.yahoo.com</a></div>