Subject: Re: oldest purely &#39;fiat&#39; international boundary?<br/>
Date: Dec 11, 2001 @ 05:59<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5060.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4932.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5069.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5071.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1228702142">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;johnfgriffiths&quot; &lt;johnfrancisgriffiths@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; The (15th? century)Treaty of Tordessillas, dividing the world into <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Spanish and Portugese spheres, may not have given the oldest such <br/>
<br/>
&gt; boundary, but it must be the longest (encircling the globe). <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>indeed our improbable search for it or them in australia is documented in messages 1590 1650 1675 1712 1721 1736 & especially 1769 & 1779 where we are left hanging from the roof in suspense as to whether we have really identified it there or not but perhaps this is another one brendan can now or soon resolve too since he was the bringer of the news in this case also<br/>
<br/>
m</div>