& the nw angle of the triangle is another hritsi tripoint
incredible
a clave with double multipoints
m
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., orc@o... wrote:
> wowowowww
>
> exactly
>
> you called it
>
> & more than that because it looks like the sw angle of the triangle is a hritsi sovereign maritime territorial tripoint the first of its kind in the world as well as a quadripoint with everyones land aka the high seas also the first of its kind in the world
>
> m
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
>
> > At last a map that confirms my suspicions. It's at
>
> > http://www.lawofthesea.net/images/m_granica.jpg . The exclave is no.
>
> > 4. Although I can't read Croatian/Slovenian well, I can see that it
>
> > is called a Croatian exclave, and that it is a "world rarity". Areas
>
> > no. 3 and 6 must be Slovenian, then. Can someone decipher the text
>
> > more reliably?
>
> >
>
> > Peter S.
>
> >
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
>
> > > Some more news on the Croatian-Slovenian border talks, as first
>
> > > mentioned by Marcel, can be found at
>
> > > http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm . It
>
> > seems
>
> > > that the Krsko (caron on s) nuclear power station is not going to
>
> > be
>
> > > a condominium; merely the question of joint ownership was discussed
>
> > > (what was the outcome is not clear to me). What _is_ strange,
>
> > > however, is the maritime delimitation agreed upon: 1. Slovenia
>
> > keeps
>
> > > (or gets) its exit to int'l waters, but 2. Croatian waters continue
>
> > > to border Italian waters. Am I right in assuming that this means
>
> > > there is a watery hr exclave, bordering it and si waters and
>
> > possibly
>
> > > international waters, but detached from the rest of the hr terr.
>
> > > waters? (We're obviously not talking EEZ's here) I think this is
>
> > > meant by the "small triangle" mentioned here.
>
> > >
>
> > > Peter S.