Subject: Re: hrsi border talks lead to wet hr exclave??<br/>
Date: Dec 02, 2001 @ 01:19<br/>
Author: orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)<br/>
<a href="4821.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4832.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3906.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4830.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4832.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1553399441">wowowowww<br/>
<br/>
exactly<br/>
<br/>
you called it<br/>
<br/>
& more than that because it looks like the sw angle of the triangle is  a hritsi sovereign maritime territorial tripoint  the first of its kind in the world  as well as a quadripoint with everyones land aka the high seas  also the first of its kind in the world<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; At last a map that confirms my suspicions. It&#39;s at <br/>
<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lawofthesea.net/images/m_granica.jpg">http://www.lawofthesea.net/images/m_granica.jpg</a> . The exclave is no. <br/>
<br/>
&gt; 4. Although I can&#39;t read Croatian/Slovenian well, I can see that it <br/>
<br/>
&gt; is called a Croatian exclave, and that it is a &quot;world rarity&quot;. Areas <br/>
<br/>
&gt; no. 3 and 6 must be Slovenian, then. Can someone decipher the text <br/>
<br/>
&gt; more reliably?<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; Some more news on the Croatian-Slovenian border talks, as first <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; mentioned by Marcel, can be found at <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm">http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm</a> . It <br/>
<br/>
&gt; seems <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; that the Krsko (caron on s) nuclear power station is not going to <br/>
<br/>
&gt; be <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; a condominium; merely the question of joint ownership was discussed <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; (what was the outcome is not clear to me). What _is_ strange, <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; however, is the maritime delimitation agreed upon: 1. Slovenia <br/>
<br/>
&gt; keeps <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; (or gets) its exit to int&#39;l waters, but 2. Croatian waters continue <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; to border Italian waters. Am I right in assuming that this means <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; there is a watery hr exclave, bordering it and si waters and <br/>
<br/>
&gt; possibly <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; international waters, but detached from the rest of the hr terr. <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; waters? (We&#39;re obviously not talking EEZ&#39;s here) I think this is <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; meant by the &quot;small triangle&quot; mentioned here.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; Peter S. </span></blockquote></div>