A most
peculiar arrangement. Details have been very scanty -- looks like the
Croatians are putting up the biggest stink even though they get a number of
villages and keep a maritime boundary
with Italy.
What
is the source of the map? Thanks for the
sleuthing.
Ray
At last a map that confirms my suspicions.
It's at
http://www.lawofthesea.net/images/m_granica.jpg
. The exclave is no.
4. Although I can't read Croatian/Slovenian well, I
can see that it
is called a Croatian exclave, and that it is a "world
rarity". Areas
no. 3 and 6 must be Slovenian, then. Can someone decipher
the text
more reliably?
Peter S.
--- In BoundaryPoint@y...,
"Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> Some more news on the
Croatian-Slovenian border talks, as first
> mentioned by Marcel, can be
found at
> http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm
. It
seems
> that the Krsko (caron on s) nuclear power station is
not going to
be
> a condominium; merely the question of joint
ownership was discussed
> (what was the outcome is not clear to me).
What _is_ strange,
> however, is the maritime delimitation agreed upon:
1. Slovenia
keeps
> (or gets) its exit to int'l waters, but 2.
Croatian waters continue
> to border Italian waters. Am I right in
assuming that this means
> there is a watery hr exclave, bordering it
and si waters and
possibly
> international waters, but detached
from the rest of the hr terr.
> waters? (We're obviously not talking
EEZ's here) I think this is
> meant by the "small triangle" mentioned
here.
>
> Peter S.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.