Subject: Re: Extreme westerly, easterly and southerly palindromes<br/>
Date: Dec 01, 2001 @ 15:10<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison (&quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4816.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4822.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4803.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4819.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4821.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-191396028"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; This Glenelg, if it still exists, would be further south than Yutuy, <br/>
&gt; Chile, and may or may not be further south than Mt. Gog.<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I once spent a very wet morning in the original village of Glenelg in<br/>
Scotland, from which you can take a tiny one-car ferry over the sea to<br/>
Skye. Oddly, there is no sign of the Glen Elg from which it might have<br/>
been expected to take its name. Instead it sits at the mouth of Glen<br/>
Mor (one of dozens in Scotland, because the name just means &quot;Big Glen&quot;). <br/>
But I digress ...<br/>
GeoNet doesn&#39;t list a Glenelg or Glen Elg in New Zealand, but that of<br/>
course doesn&#39;t mean it doesn&#39;t exist. N.Z. and Argentina (and Chile<br/>
itself) are cetainly the only likely locations to better the Chilean<br/>
record.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>