Subject: Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
Date: Nov 08, 2001 @ 16:19
Author: anton_zeilinger@hotmail.com (anton_zeilinger@...)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., PitHokie <pithokie@y...> wrote:
> Peter et. al,
>
> Texas is unique in that it's the only part of the
> continental United States that was ever been
> independently governed as its own country.
> It's also been under more official rulers than any
> other part of the continental U.S. If you travel to
> the Capitol in Austin, you will find in the rotunda a
> seal of all the countries Texas has been ruled by:
> Spain, France, Mexico, Texas, and the United States.
> Texas was independent from April, 1836 until the U.S.
> annexed it in 1845.
>
> Brendan
>
> --- Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., PitHokie <pithokie@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > The difference is in name only. Governmentally,
> > there
> > > is no difference between a state and a
> > commonwealth.
> >
> > I know that in Germany, two "Laender" have the
> > official designation
> > of "Freistaat": Bavaria and Saxony. I don't know
> > whether this has any
> > implications. Does someone know?
> >
> > And I remember vaguely that the position of Texas is
> > fundamentally
> > different from all other states in the US (because
> > it used to be an
> > independent republic). Can someone say something
> > about that?
> >
> > What about the difference between territories in
> > countries like
> > Canada, Australia, and Russia (=krai) and the
> > regular subdivisions?
> > Why is it like this and what are the practical
> > implications?
> >
> > Peter S.
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com