Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
Date: Nov 08, 2001 @ 13:11
Author: PitHokie (PitHokie <pithokie@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Peter et. al,

Texas is unique in that it's the only part of the
continental United States that was ever been
independently governed as its own country.
It's also been under more official rulers than any
other part of the continental U.S. If you travel to
the Capitol in Austin, you will find in the rotunda a
seal of all the countries Texas has been ruled by:
Spain, France, Mexico, Texas, and the United States.
Texas was independent from April, 1836 until the U.S.
annexed it in 1845.

Brendan

--- Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@...> wrote:
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., PitHokie <pithokie@y...>
> wrote:
> > The difference is in name only. Governmentally,
> there
> > is no difference between a state and a
> commonwealth.
>
> I know that in Germany, two "Laender" have the
> official designation
> of "Freistaat": Bavaria and Saxony. I don't know
> whether this has any
> implications. Does someone know?
>
> And I remember vaguely that the position of Texas is
> fundamentally
> different from all other states in the US (because
> it used to be an
> independent republic). Can someone say something
> about that?
>
> What about the difference between territories in
> countries like
> Canada, Australia, and Russia (=krai) and the
> regular subdivisions?
> Why is it like this and what are the practical
> implications?
>
> Peter S.
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com