Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
Date: Nov 07, 2001 @ 18:45
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: "Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
>Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 18:24:19 -0000
>
>--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., PitHokie <pithokie@y...> wrote:
> > The difference is in name only. Governmentally, there
> > is no difference between a state and a commonwealth.
>
>I know that in Germany, two "Laender" have the official designation
>of "Freistaat": Bavaria and Saxony. I don't know whether this has any
>implications. Does someone know?
>
>And I remember vaguely that the position of Texas is fundamentally
>different from all other states in the US (because it used to be an
>independent republic). Can someone say something about that?
>
>What about the difference between territories in countries like
>Canada, Australia, and Russia (=krai) and the regular subdivisions?
>Why is it like this and what are the practical implications?
>
>Peter S.
>