Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: a tripointing puzzle joke<br/>
Date: Nov 24, 2005 @ 17:33<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="18860.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18866.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic18823.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="18861.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18863.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1067300062">The development is the hardest part to explain, unless the developer was wrong <br/>
as to both the mapped line and the newly recovered line.<br/>
<br/>
Here&#39;s the language from the article:<br/>
________________<br/>
<br/>
A developer looking to put a subdivision along Solomon Run Road asked Adams <br/>
Township supervisors to allow his entire 60-plus acres to be considered <br/>
Richland.  The developer thought it was mostly Richland already, Supervisor <br/>
William &quot;B.J.&quot; Smith said.  After Brown&#39;s survey, it turns out the proposed <br/>
development is nearly all in Adams Township.<br/>
________________<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 2:56 AM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: a tripointing puzzle joke<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; great<br/>
&gt; thanx<br/>
&gt; & agreed that it is more likely that 2 or more lost intermediate adri marks <br/>
&gt; have been found<br/>
&gt; to transform the single continuous northmost adri segment into a few very <br/>
&gt; slight zigzags<br/>
&gt; than that both terminals of the northmost adri segment were lost & have been <br/>
&gt; found<br/>
&gt; one of them being the true adcori & the other a corrected southern turnpoint <br/>
&gt; on extant<br/>
&gt; adri southeast of the mapped southern turnpoint<br/>
&gt; as i was wanting to believe when i thought i had to account for 400 feet of <br/>
&gt; shift<br/>
&gt; to erase & replace the entire northmost mapped segment of adri<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; also i just noticed the 1993 topo shows no fewer than 8 structures practically <br/>
&gt; touching<br/>
&gt; adri from one side or the other<br/>
&gt; or certainly within 50 feet of it<br/>
&gt; making the 400 foot estimate far greater than needed in any case<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; the only remaining bit of data that it is hard to account for<br/>
&gt; is the 30 or so acres of the development on solomon run road that must have <br/>
&gt; shifted from<br/>
&gt; richland into adams<br/>
&gt; for if the displacement of adri is really measurable in slight zigzags of tens <br/>
&gt; rather than<br/>
&gt; hundreds of feet<br/>
&gt; as i agree now seems far likelier<br/>
&gt; then this development parcel has to be at least 2 and a half miles in length<br/>
&gt; thus giving it a shape which the configuration of solomon run road in relation <br/>
&gt; to adri<br/>
&gt; doesnt seem to permit<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; do you see the difficulty<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; but apart from disposing of that one remaining rough spot<br/>
&gt; i would agree<br/>
&gt; it is now looking like adcori may well not have displaced at all </span></blockquote></div>