true
which is how i figured 30 odd of his acres had shifted towns
& that his layout is therefore still totally enigmatic & inexplicable
but anyway no problem because
i am fairly well satisfied already on the main deal
as i gather you also are
without delving into these imperceptible wiggles any more deeply
nor promising to call the surveyor again first thing monday morning again either
that there is in fact no particular reason to even hope the adcori tripoint has moved a jot
&
that therefore
this entire topic & its now dozen odd messages
& the possible intrusion that it may originally have represented last sunday evening
was in fact as totally unwarranted as is this possible intrusion into thanxgiving
simply in order to concede that it was in fact off topic & off point the first time
& presumably therefore an unwarranted rather than a warranted intrusion both times
except
some tries are just class e
& too
now we already have a somewhat celebrated tripoint to really visit here
that we can now be pretty sure hasnt moved
when in central pennsylvania
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@m...>
wrote:
>
> The development is the hardest part to explain, unless the developer was wrong
> as to both the mapped line and the newly recovered line.
>
> Here's the language from the article:
> ________________
>
> A developer looking to put a subdivision along Solomon Run Road asked Adams
> Township supervisors to allow his entire 60-plus acres to be considered
> Richland. The developer thought it was mostly Richland already, Supervisor
> William "B.J." Smith said. After Brown's survey, it turns out the proposed
> development is nearly all in Adams Township.
> ________________
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 2:56 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: a tripointing puzzle joke
>
>
> > great
> > thanx
> > & agreed that it is more likely that 2 or more lost intermediate adri marks
> > have been found
> > to transform the single continuous northmost adri segment into a few very
> > slight zigzags
> > than that both terminals of the northmost adri segment were lost & have been
> > found
> > one of them being the true adcori & the other a corrected southern turnpoint
> > on extant
> > adri southeast of the mapped southern turnpoint
> > as i was wanting to believe when i thought i had to account for 400 feet of
> > shift
> > to erase & replace the entire northmost mapped segment of adri
> >
> > also i just noticed the 1993 topo shows no fewer than 8 structures practically
> > touching
> > adri from one side or the other
> > or certainly within 50 feet of it
> > making the 400 foot estimate far greater than needed in any case
> >
> >
> > the only remaining bit of data that it is hard to account for
> > is the 30 or so acres of the development on solomon run road that must have
> > shifted from
> > richland into adams
> > for if the displacement of adri is really measurable in slight zigzags of tens
> > rather than
> > hundreds of feet
> > as i agree now seems far likelier
> > then this development parcel has to be at least 2 and a half miles in length
> > thus giving it a shape which the configuration of solomon run road in relation
> > to adri
> > doesnt seem to permit
> >
> > do you see the difficulty
> >
> >
> > but apart from disposing of that one remaining rough spot
> > i would agree
> > it is now looking like adcori may well not have displaced at all
>