Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: could a definitive cnkzru & marker be far behind<br/>
Date: Nov 24, 2005 @ 17:36<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="18861.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18865.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic18317.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="18862.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18864.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-606504923">Mike D. wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; btw i believe the claim made in the article that kzru is the longest land <br/>
&gt; border in the world<br/>
&gt; is true only if caus is considered as 2 separate land borders<br/>
&gt; causn & causs<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Either that or the Russians are still claiming Alaska!  :-)<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA</div>