Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] library of congress<br/>
Date: Apr 07, 2005 @ 17:24<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="17297.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17301.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic17293.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="17298.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17300.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-648412603">Good work!<br/>
<br/>
If you should strike out on the 1905 DENJ compact maps at the Library of <br/>
Congress, perhaps they can be found in the state archives at Dover or Trenton, <br/>
now that you know exactly what is needed.<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:57 AM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] library of congress<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; still waiting for my researchers<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; re the denj arc<br/>
&gt; no maps have yet been found associated with the 1905 denj compact that<br/>
&gt; the special master based his recommendation on in 1934<br/>
&gt; & which i may only have wrongly presumed was the basis for the location<br/>
&gt; of the arc<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & the text of the compact makes no specific mention of the location of<br/>
&gt; this arc either<br/>
&gt; but only refers to the 12 mile circle generally<br/>
&gt; yikes<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so that is a most peculiar apparent dead end<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & they are going to have to get back to me on it in case they missed<br/>
&gt; something<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; i am still pretty satisfied tho that i did find among the map exhibits<br/>
&gt; at least a 1925 regeneration of whatever map was used to set the<br/>
&gt; location<br/>
&gt; whenever & however it actually was agreed upon<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so the graphical source of the determination of the location is known<br/>
&gt; even if not yet the exact cause of its weirdness<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & the 1893 hodgkins & 1908 mathews reports from the bus&ss bibliography<br/>
&gt; that are indispensable for other & related questions have been acting<br/>
&gt; similarly elusive<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so i may have hit a multiple brick wall here<br/>
&gt; especially as my researcher is about to head out to lunch now<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; but more later </span></blockquote></div>