Okay, fine. I never said that I'd done the math. I don't think anybody in
present company has but you. I was only brainstorming suggestions in an attempt
to explain the seemingly inexplicable. If the math didn't check out, you could
have said so several tens of thousands of keystrokes ago.
I'm done with DENJ until we hear from the Special Master.
Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Sandy Schenck Speaks!
>
> --- "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...> wrote:
>
>> Mike D.,
>>
>> You wrote:
>>
>> > excuse me
>> > but i think your problem here
>> > since i know i have no problem myself
>> > is that all your compound & complex curve notions
>> are busted by
>> > the evidence that we do have
>> > from the supremes themselves
>> > in plain english
>> > that this is the arc arc arc of a circle circle
>> circle centered on the
>> > good old courthouse spire
>>
>> So, do you suppose that the northern boundary of
>> Tennesee is a single, unbroken
>> line along 36° 30'? No, that's a delimitation. The
>> boundary as demarcated
>> wanders all over the place and even occasionally
>> gets toothy. (I know that you
>> know the difference.)
>
> hahahahaha
> hahahahahaha
> ahhh
>
> you have such a delicate way of putting things maestro
>
> & i am glad it came out this way
>
> but you are in the present case not distinguishing
> between the irrelevant toothiness of 1701
> which we know ran up to nearly 7 percent on depa
> & the actually relevant toothiness of 1892 thru 1935
> on depa
> which
> except for the glaring undermeasurement in question
> we know ran only up to about half a percent
> which btw is precisely why it is so glaring
>
> & in putting things in your undistinguishing way you
> are not only subjecting yourself to a correspondingly
> glaring & needless confusion of scale in general
> but
> at the comparatively minuscule level of aberration
> that actually applies to them
> your specific suggestions are mathematically
> impossible
>
> for your posited projection of the nearly 13mile
> radius denjpa arc down to artificial island
> which i believe is the last of your guesses that isnt
> flatly contradicted by the hard data we do have
> cannot in fact intersect at all with
> but will only perpetually run rings around
> the lower scarcely 11mile denj arc projection centered
> on the same point
>
> & it isnt even close
>
> they miss by a literal mile & a half at best
>
> indeed the intersecting arcs your guess specifically
> posits here can in fact never meet anywhere at all on
> their entire circumferences
>
> there just isnt enough wobble possible even in your
> admittedly fantastic construction
>
> Similarly, DEPA is delimited
>> as an "arc arc arc" of a
>> twelve-mile "circle circle circle," but it is
>> demarcated sometimes more,
>> sometimes less, and sometimes with another center.
>> While the Supremes delimit
>> two segments of DENJ as acrs of the same twelve-mile
>> circle, they decree the
>> demarcations otherwise. As to the downriver one, we
>> have no evidence yet as to
>> the reason why. Zip! Until we hear from the
>> Special Master, we are left only
>> to guess.
>>
>> > & you would like me not to keep reminding you of
>> that when you
>> > keep offering these impossibilities & trying to
>> somehow justify
>> > them as real probabilities in our hunt
>>
>> The admittedly far-fetched guesses that I have
>> proposed are indeed
>> "impossibilities" in terms of the delimitation, but
>> they are no more impossible
>> than the other demarcations that exist on this
>> circle.
>
> ahem
>
> & so
> in a nutshell
> yes yes yes
> they are far more impossible
> hahaha
> & far more implausible too
>
> indeed something like 14 times more impossible &
> implausible combined
> hahahaha
> no kidding
>
>> Lowell G. McManus
>> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>