--- "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...> wrote:

> Mike D.,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > excuse me
> > but i think your problem here
> > since i know i have no problem myself
> > is that all your compound & complex curve notions
> are busted by
> > the evidence that we do have
> > from the supremes themselves
> > in plain english
> > that this is the arc arc arc of a circle circle
> circle centered on the
> > good old courthouse spire
>
> So, do you suppose that the northern boundary of
> Tennesee is a single, unbroken
> line along 36� 30'? No, that's a delimitation. The
> boundary as demarcated
> wanders all over the place and even occasionally
> gets toothy. (I know that you
> know the difference.)

hahahahaha
hahahahahaha
ahhh

you have such a delicate way of putting things maestro

& i am glad it came out this way

but you are in the present case not distinguishing
between the irrelevant toothiness of 1701
which we know ran up to nearly 7 percent on depa
& the actually relevant toothiness of 1892 thru 1935
on depa
which
except for the glaring undermeasurement in question
we know ran only up to about half a percent
which btw is precisely why it is so glaring

& in putting things in your undistinguishing way you
are not only subjecting yourself to a correspondingly
glaring & needless confusion of scale in general
but
at the comparatively minuscule level of aberration
that actually applies to them
your specific suggestions are mathematically
impossible

for your posited projection of the nearly 13mile
radius denjpa arc down to artificial island
which i believe is the last of your guesses that isnt
flatly contradicted by the hard data we do have
cannot in fact intersect at all with
but will only perpetually run rings around
the lower scarcely 11mile denj arc projection centered
on the same point

& it isnt even close

they miss by a literal mile & a half at best

indeed the intersecting arcs your guess specifically
posits here can in fact never meet anywhere at all on
their entire circumferences

there just isnt enough wobble possible even in your
admittedly fantastic construction

Similarly, DEPA is delimited

> as an "arc arc arc" of a
> twelve-mile "circle circle circle," but it is
> demarcated sometimes more,
> sometimes less, and sometimes with another center.
> While the Supremes delimit
> two segments of DENJ as acrs of the same twelve-mile
> circle, they decree the
> demarcations otherwise. As to the downriver one, we
> have no evidence yet as to
> the reason why. Zip! Until we hear from the
> Special Master, we are left only
> to guess.
>
> > & you would like me not to keep reminding you of
> that when you
> > keep offering these impossibilities & trying to
> somehow justify
> > them as real probabilities in our hunt
>
> The admittedly far-fetched guesses that I have
> proposed are indeed
> "impossibilities" in terms of the delimitation, but
> they are no more impossible
> than the other demarcations that exist on this
> circle.

ahem

& so
in a nutshell
yes yes yes
they are far more impossible
hahaha
& far more implausible too

indeed something like 14 times more impossible &
implausible combined
hahahaha
no kidding

> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail