Subject: Re: enclaves on stamps
Date: Sep 17, 2004 @ 03:37
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> ok mikeyes it is & please excuse the unavoidable interruption above
> this feels much better to me yet again
>
> thank you
>
>
> & wouldnt you know i actually had to cut off the bottom of your
> message again just now in order to add this comment on top
>
> i swear it
>
> so you have cosmically outstacked me now for the 3rd time
> & i celebrate this attainment with you of your stacking hat trick &
> authentic multiple prowess
>
> just as i celebrate & appreciate your acknowledgements of my
> own extremities & enormities here below too
>
>
> & i would answer your excellent new question as follows
>
> to avoid confusion as well as contention
> i would simply qualify all claves & maybeclaves alike
> by the year in which they were last heard from or reported
>
> thus amaz karki 2004
>
> & amaz tatlis 1978 or whatever
>
> etc
>
> so by 2005
> if neither are heard from or reported again
> say by the cia or the local schoolmaster
> or anyone else remotely credible
> karki becomes a maybeclave
> but far less of a maybeclave than the tatlis now are
>
> & to indicate confirmed discontinuation
> which is a different matter
> we could give dates fore & aft
>
> but i have run out of
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > Where would you write? Still needs more specificity
> > in terms of addressing. Call it a postal expedition
> > perhaps. There may be a real expedtion there in a
> > couple of years.
> > If anyone can outstack or outmessagecite it would be
> > you. You have cited more messages than anyone else,
> > along with creating more messages than anyone else,
> > along with replying to your own messages more than
> > anyone else.
> > "i will simply offer & endeavor to answer frankly your
> > any fair & simple question"
> > Ok. By your reasoning, anyone could say that the
> > other
> > 4 exclaves are "maybeclaves" since they haven't
> > been "heard from" since the date of the last map
> > showing them. Would you call them maybeclaves as
> > well? That is a fair and simple question.