Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: enclaves on stamps
Date: Sep 13, 2004 @ 02:03
Author: Michael Kaufman (Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> exactly__________________________________
> you have finally hit it in your afterword here
> maestro
>
> & the tripoints sometimes do indeed move about etc
> so we only know for sure what was supposedly true at
> the time
> they were last visited &or reported etc
> so i absolutely agree with you about the tripoints &
> claves equally
>
> & thats one reason for & benefit of reporting on
> them repeatedly
>
> & you have proved these particular crumbs existed
> circa 1976 &
> possibly as recently as 1978
> tho i believe your logic is still questionable there
> in msg 15345
> hahaha
> however unworth questioning just to reduce by 2 the
> 28 years
> during which i still do believe they havent been
> heard from
>
> & in the meantime whole governments & nation states
> have
> come & gone ferociously several times all thru there
> which do in fact now recognize & mention all the
> well known
> classmates of these maybeclaves but have apparently
> never
> mentioned these crumbs during at least 26 of these
> 28 years
>
> so i am content to believe them real as of 1976 or
> maybe 1978
> & looking forward to more & fresher data
> via whatever aspiring clavoscopist provides it
>
> & i have just been responding to your claim in
> message 15272
> of what you think we have
> by telling you i know we once had them but i
> seriously question if
> we still have them
>
> i am not stuck in your fantasy tho
>
> & anyway time will tell
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > By the same token, the tripoint could have
> > moved...maybe the cartogrophers just didn't know
> about
> > it. The AMAZGE tripoint could have moved (or even
> > ceased to exist!) - it's just that it wasn't shown
> or
> > said, "if something isnt shown or said it only
> means
> > it wasnt shown or said not that it was or wasnt a
> > fact."
> >
> > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> >
> > > thanx
> > > good idea specifically
> > > & good for the aspiring clavoscopist to be so
> > > diligent in any case
> > >
> > > but one cant presume the cartographers knew
> anything
> > > other
> > > than what they actually drew or wrote
> > >
> > > if something isnt shown or said
> > > it only means it wasnt shown or said
> > > not that it was or wasnt a fact
> > > & not that anyone had any specific inkling about
> it
> > > or even any
> > > general awareness of it
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
> > > McManus"
> > > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > > Mike D. asked:
> > > >
> > > > > if the claves were discontinued
> > > > > their borders couldnt & wouldnt have been
> > > redrawn but only
> > > > > eliminated or forgotten
> > > > >
> > > > > would the mapmakers have just scrawled a big
> > > purple cross
> > > > > over each clave to let us know in that case
> > > > >
> > > > > or exactly how would they redraw something
> that
> > > had
> > > completely
> > > > > vanished
> > > > > short of erasing it
> > > > > which they couldnt do
> > > >
> > > > I the addition of a purple overprint was the
> only
> > > means of
> > > revision available,
> > > > the cartographers would likely have added a
> text
> > > notation in
> > > purple that
> > > > such-and-such claves no longer existed. I
> suggest
> > > that you go
> > > back and check
> > > > the margins and legend of the map for such
> purple
> > > text.
> > > >
> > > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping.
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool
>
>