because it indicates that the depiction of the clave borders in
black on this map dates from the first printing in 1976
& that for whatever reason these claves & their borders were
ignored when all the other borders were revised & overprinted in
purple in 1978
but i think the purple probably indicates actual border revisions
rather than corrections of mistakes
presumably these authoritative maps were correct when the
borders were first drawn in black
& were correct again when they were revised in purple
& the fact that the borders of these claves were not purpled over
could mean that they continued unchanged in 1978
& possibly even right up to the present
or it could mean that they ceased to exist by then or later
& we dont know which it does mean
but without any subsequent trace or mention of them anywhere
else that we do know of
i think it is fair to say they have not been heard from in 28 years
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
<mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> Why would 14183 suggest that?
>
> --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
>
> > thanx chris
> >
> > it is unclear if any of these people are
> > credentialed in clavoscopy
> >
> > but
> >
> > regarding the 2 extra quasiclaves or maybeclaves
> > that i just
> > questioned
> > not here below but in the separate message 15273
> >
> > a careful reading of the text in your first link
> > here below
> > especially
> > ob sie je eine reale rolle gespielt haben ist
> > unbekannt
> > which in normal barbarian means
> > whether they ever actually performed as claves is
> > unknown
> >
> > plus
> >
> > a careful reading of the info in message 14183
> >
> > together
> > suggest that these supposed claves or clavicules
> > if indeed they ever really existed at all
> > may actually not have been heard from in at least 28
> > years
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "chris schulz"
> >
> > <23568@g...> wrote:
> > > http://home.pages.at/maxifant/Frames/armenien.htm
> > > http://home.pages.at/maxifant/Frames/karabakh.htm
> > >
> > > here you may find additional maps.
> > >
> > > regards, chris
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Michael Kaufman
> > > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 7:49 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: enclaves on
> > stamps
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok cool. But we have 6 total exclaves, not 4.
> > > So it must be the 4 others which are
> > non-Nakhichevan
> > > instead of 2.
> > >
> > http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/enclaves.htm
> > > http://home.no.net/enklaver/azerbaijan.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > --- aletheiak <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > politically kyarki is part of the nakhichevan
> > > > autonomous republic
> > > >
> > > > but of course topologically both kyarki & the
> > > > greater chunk of
> > > > nakhichevan are exclaves of the azerbaijan
> > republic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & the 2 other azerbaijan exclaves are not part
> > of
> > > > nakhichevan
> > > > autonomous republic but of the azerbaijan
> > republic
> > > > proper
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > > > Kaufman
> > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > Is Kyarki part of Nakhichevan or is it a
> > separate
> > > > > Azerbaijani exclave? I'm guessing yes due
> > to the
> > > > > close proximity, but would like to know for
> > sure.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@u...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Another Nakhichevan issue on ebay, showing
> > > > Kiarky.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AND the seller is in Lithuania!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3495&i
> > > > tem=5517623720&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brendan
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail