precisely my point in message 14664
which of course trumps everything previously tried or requested
unless you can find either marker 134 or marker 136
& use one or the other or both of them to sight thru marker 135
you will not necessarily have attained the best possible read on
the atli convergent
using only the directional alignment shown on top of marker 135
as was done previously will get you close but not necessarily on
point
& unless frost heaving is quite significant
using marker 133 at all for sighting thru marker 135
tho also close
is probably not as good as ignoring it in preference to using
marker 135 alone
& this hierarchy of preferences has already been established by
careful computation
do you understand
it is possible that the reason you didnt find markers 136 & 134 is
that they no longer exist or are overgrown
but the geocoords peter just provided should at least tell you
exactly where to look for them
do you understand
i could give you the exact distances of marker 134 from 135 &
133 if wanted
so you will at least stand a good chance of finding its hole or
former location or hiding place
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> What happened to 136?
>
> http://www.geocities.com/mafiapetedk/tpatchfl1.html
>
> 134 is missing too.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Smaardijk
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:14 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Re; Map sites (ATCHFLN)
>
>
> For the last stretch of ATLI towards ATCHLIn see
> http://tinyurl.com/4jeut
>
> The last markers are 135 and 136.
>
> Peter S.
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
<aletheiak@y...>
> wrote:
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > On GCEBE Fran tried to reach the "tp island" .
> > >
> > > According to the line on the last marker before the tp, the
> island
> > was not hosting the tripoint.
> > >
> > > The CEBT-team is expected to go there next month. Any
specific
> > requests we should carry out there?
> > >
> > > Jesper
> >
> > yes
> > now that we are confident that the thalweg marks both chli &
atch
> > could you recheck the alignment of atli
> > by comparing the groove in the top of the terminal marker on
the
> bank
> > with the position of the penultimate marker
> > number 133 i believe
> > located a stones throw up the hill
> > just in case there has been any frost heaving etc of the
witness
> > rock since your last visit
> >
> > & having done that
> > could you then try to identify & reach the thalweg at the point
> > where this reconfirmed atli monument sight line strikes it
> >
> > unless the river is very low
> > it looks like at least an inner tube & security line would be
> needed
> > for this first precision class b try for this point
> >
> > & of course take a picture of the try itself
> > if there is anyone left over to hold a camera
> >
> >
> > but who all will be going
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.