Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Re; Map sites (ATCHFLN)
Date: Jul 18, 2004 @ 21:32
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


What happened to 136?
 
http://www.geocities.com/mafiapetedk/tpatchfl1.html
 
134 is missing too.
 
Jesper
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Smaardijk
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Re; Map sites (ATCHFLN)

For the last stretch of ATLI towards ATCHLIn see
http://tinyurl.com/4jeut

The last markers are 135 and 136.

Peter S.

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
wrote:
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
> <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > On GCEBE Fran tried to reach the "tp island" .
> >
> > According to the line on the last marker before the tp, the
island
> was not hosting the tripoint.
> >
> > The CEBT-team is expected to go there next month. Any specific
> requests we should carry out there?
> >
> > Jesper
>
> yes
> now that we are confident that the thalweg marks both chli & atch
> could you recheck the alignment of atli
> by comparing the groove in the top of the terminal marker on the
bank
> with the position of the penultimate marker
> number 133 i believe
> located a stones throw up the hill
> just in case there has been any frost heaving etc of the witness
> rock since your last visit
>
> & having done that
> could you then try to identify & reach the thalweg at the point
> where this reconfirmed atli monument sight line strikes it
>
> unless the river is very low
> it looks like at least an inner tube & security line would be
needed
> for this first precision class b try for this point
>
> & of course take a picture of the try itself
> if there is anyone left over to hold a camera
>
>
> but who all will be going