Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Vatican boundary faith<br/>
Date: Apr 20, 2004 @ 00:55<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;mcmanus71496@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="14013.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14017.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic13994.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="14014.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14016.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-677040333">Mike wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; & have incidentally traded positions back again in order to<br/>
&gt; disagree about a third detail<br/>
&gt; namely<br/>
&gt; the short proruption of the passetto into via porta angelica<br/>
&gt; or perhaps it is only above & not really into this street<br/>
&gt; & evidently only as far as the iron gate that was recently found<br/>
&gt; but again as claimed only on the above official map<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>The iron gate that marks the boundary on the Passetto is on the Vatican side of<br/>
the archway through which the street passes.  Therefore, there is no question of<br/>
Vatican sovereignty &quot;above&quot; the street.<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA</div>