if the text & translation & my reading of it are all correct
then
the 3 obelisks define a circle with the tripoint at its center
&
the faces with the emblems are perpendicular to the tripoint
as well as horizontally equidistant from it
but are all 3 obelisks at about the same elevation
& again
can anyone sketch the full layout
whether within or without regard to the diagram we already have
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/6091
>
> Peter S. (acting as Pepijn H. ;-))
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Petter Brabec
> <pete2784west@y...> wrote:
> > Hallo, at this link, in Czech, the locals explain how the
process
> of setting up the monoliths around the tripoint went, all the
> necessary measures and other trivia.
> >
> > http://www.volny.cz/obec.hrcava/trojmezi.html
> >
> > At the present moment, I'm unable to translate it, so anybody
who's
> interested can give it a shot. Otherwise, give me a day or two,
and
> I'll translate the core theme that, as I understand it from the
> confusion up to now, is of interest to you.
> >
> > Petter
> >
> > Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > I think the 1st three pics are CZ instead of SK.
> > Because the Sk monument was across the larger of the 2
> > streams and all by itself.
> > Picture 2 - the small marker was actually on the CZ-PL
> > border - direct marker here.
> > Picture 5 - my initial guess was that it looked along
> > CZ-PL and that it was the PL marker. So now we have
> > three different possibilites here! Really this is a
> > confusing pic for me. Perhaps it looks at the SK
> > marker from the tp? But this would not be along a
> > border, just SK territory.
> >
> > --- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > I have already written to the site authors
> > > requesting a better quality map,
> > > plus the other tripoints. Still wating patiently.
> > >
> > > I am very interested in seeing especially CZPLSK in
> > > a better scale, as I too
> > > find it difficult too see what's going on, even
> > > after being their in person.
> > > I don't recall all spots.
> > >
> > > Please find enclosed the CZPLSK map with my arrows.
> > > The blue arrow shows the
> > > angle of which the photo on
> > >
> > http://pikomat.mff.cuni.cz/fotky/tabor/1996/f01/24hrcava.html
> > > was taken.
> > >
> > > The red arrow show where I believe I was sitting
> > > pointing to the ground
> > > facing south, which probably is not the tripoint
> > > judging from the map. Looks
> > > like it's further east. But it's a very difficult
> > > tripoint because it's
> > > inside forest and down a valley. It would have been
> > > nice to have known this
> > > map before we went there.
> > >
> > > Rolf's site gives a good view af all three tp
> > > markers at
> > >
> > http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/BordersCRPS.htm
> > >
> > > picture 1, the PL tp marker left, SK right. Facing
> > > south. The crew is
> > > walking N on the path going up a long the border to
> > > the road.
> > >
> > > picture 2, closeup on the PL and SK tp markers. I
> > > wonder if Mike Kaufman
> > > noted what the small red hat markers said.
> > >
> > > picture 3, closeup of SK marker
> > >
> > > picture 5, I think Rolf is wrong here. This is
> > > facing S from the TP and show
> > > the CZ tp marker. I remember the red hat marker
> > > still said CS, so I must
> > > have been an indirect marker from CSPL.
> > >
> > > picture 6, looks very different from mine??
> > >
> > > I have a picture facing east from the tripoint (or
> > > where I belived it was).
> > > Want to see it?
> > >
> > > Jesper
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> > > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:37 PM
> > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: ATHUSK/CZPLSK/ATCZSK
> > > border maps
> > >
> > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> > > Nielsen"
> > > > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > http://www.atlaskrajiny.sk/sk/myimages/2_sub_2.jpg
> > > >
> > > > these are lovely
> > > > & i wish their 2 remaining sister diagrams will
> > > arrive soon too
> > > >
> > > > of course atczsk is the greatest charmer
> > > > having been selected as point 2 on gcebe
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/graenser/tripoints
> > > > & then again as point 1 on geebe
> > > >
> > >
> > http://www.geocities.com/graenser/geebe/tripoints.htm
> > > > with some apparent improvement
> > > >
> > > > the other diagrams are harder for me to see &or
> > > read tho
> > > >
> > > > for example could you show on the czplsk diagram
> > > > where you are situated in the geebe point 2 pic
> > > above
> > > > & where the monuments shown in the link below are
> > > situated
> > > >
> > >
> > http://pikomat.mff.cuni.cz/fotky/tabor/1996/f01/24hrcava.html
> > > >
> > > > which btw i found at your site too
> > > >
> > > > & what is the cause of my double vision on 2 of
> > > the vectors in the
> > > > athusk diagram
> > > > aka gcebe point 3
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> > Ny versjon av Yahoo! Messenger
> > Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og
dobbelt så
> morsom