Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: ATHUSK/CZPLSK/ATCZSK border maps
Date: Mar 24, 2004 @ 20:52
Author: Petter Brabec (=?iso-8859-1?q?Petter=20Brabec?= <pete2784west@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Nice translation job and it spares me a job : ). But even you can see, that some pretty important sentences about distances and geometrical facts are left out in the translation. Just check it out and you'll see what I mean. I believe, that these parametres and distances around the CZPLSK tripoint will make the map from the Slovakian geodetic atlas, that Jesper posted, much clearer.
 
Petter

Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@...> wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/6091

Peter S. (acting as Pepijn H. ;-))

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Petter Brabec
<pete2784west@y...> wrote:
> Hallo, at this link, in Czech, the locals explain how the process
of setting up the monoliths around the tripoint went, all the
necessary measures and other trivia.

> http://www.volny.cz/obec.hrcava/trojmezi.html

> At the present moment, I'm unable to translate it, so anybody who's
interested can give it a shot. Otherwise, give me a day or two, and
I'll translate the core theme that, as I understand it from the
confusion up to now, is of interest to you.
>
> Petter
>
> Michael Kaufman <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> I think the 1st three pics are CZ instead of SK.
> Because the Sk monument was across the larger of the 2
> streams and all by itself. 
> Picture 2 - the small marker was actually on the CZ-PL
> border - direct marker here.
> Picture 5 - my initial guess was that it looked along
> CZ-PL and that it was the PL marker.  So now we have
> three different possibilites here!  Really this is a
> confusing pic for me.  Perhaps it looks at the SK
> marker from the tp?  But this would not be along a
> border, just SK territory. 
>
> --- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > I have already written to the site authors
> > requesting a better quality map,
> > plus the other tripoints. Still wating patiently.
> >
> > I am very interested in seeing especially CZPLSK in
> > a better scale, as I too
> > find it difficult too see what's going on, even
> > after being their in person.
> > I don't recall all spots.
> >
> > Please find enclosed the CZPLSK map with my arrows.
> > The blue arrow shows the
> > angle of which the photo on
> >
> http://pikomat.mff.cuni.cz/fotky/tabor/1996/f01/24hrcava.html
> > was taken.
> >
> > The red arrow show where I believe I was sitting
> > pointing to the ground
> > facing south, which probably is not the tripoint
> > judging from the map. Looks
> > like it's further east. But it's a very difficult
> > tripoint because it's
> > inside forest and down a valley. It would have been
> > nice to have known this
> > map before we went there.
> >
> > Rolf's site gives a good view af all three tp
> > markers at
> >
> http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/BordersCRPS.htm
> >
> > picture 1, the PL tp marker left, SK right. Facing
> > south. The crew is
> > walking N on the path going up a long the border to
> > the road.
> >
> > picture 2, closeup on the PL and SK tp markers. I
> > wonder if Mike Kaufman
> > noted what the small red hat markers said.
> >
> > picture 3, closeup of SK marker
> >
> > picture 5, I think Rolf is wrong here. This is
> > facing S from the TP and show
> > the CZ tp marker. I remember the red hat marker
> > still said CS, so I must
> > have been an indirect marker from CSPL.
> >
> > picture 6, looks very different from mine??
> >
> > I have a picture facing east from the tripoint (or
> > where I belived it was).
> > Want to see it?
> >
> > Jesper
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> > To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:37 PM
> > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: ATHUSK/CZPLSK/ATCZSK
> > border maps
> >
> >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> > Nielsen"
> > > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > >
> > http://www.atlaskrajiny.sk/sk/myimages/2_sub_2.jpg
> > >
> > > these are lovely
> > > & i wish their 2 remaining sister diagrams will
> > arrive soon too
> > >
> > > of course atczsk is the greatest charmer
> > > having been selected as point 2 on gcebe
> > > http://www.geocities.com/graenser/tripoints
> > > & then again as point 1 on geebe
> > >
> >
> http://www.geocities.com/graenser/geebe/tripoints.htm
> > > with some apparent improvement
> > >
> > > the other diagrams are harder for me to see &or
> > read tho
> > >
> > > for example could you show on the czplsk diagram
> > > where you are situated in the geebe point 2 pic
> > above
> > > & where the monuments shown in the link below are
> > situated
> > >
> >
> http://pikomat.mff.cuni.cz/fotky/tabor/1996/f01/24hrcava.html
> > >
> > > which btw i found at your site too
> > >
> > > & what is the cause of my double vision on 2 of
> > the vectors in the
> > > athusk diagram
> > > aka gcebe point 3
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> Ny versjon av Yahoo! Messenger
> Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt så
morsom

Ny versjon av Yahoo! Messenger
Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt så morsom