--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
<mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> Ok well at least you seem to be understanding me
> better, and I understanding you better.
yes yes
made it worth our going thru the ceiling
didnt it
I do enjoy
> reading your try pointing and tripointing accounts.
thank you mike
that is gratification personified
I
> have probably read them all with sincere interest for
> the last couple of years. So I really do mean what I
> say about GNASTP.
is that gnastp as in
nasty pee
with a silent gee & a clear tp
hahahaha
well
i have been into serendipitous peregrination just about all my life
first ran away from home spontaneously at the age of 3 i think
or maybe it was 2
but my great north american serendipitous tripointing
peregrination has only been going on for about the past 15 years
I am not trying to say anything for
> effect, just for truth.
well now that we have changed the truth of bp
you dont even have to worry about that
everything is truth here now
And yes I know you are more
> for doing and going than planning in these adventures.
> But that is a good thing, as I enjoy reading the
> spontaneous adventures you seem to have (TX customs
> clave, etc).
yes i am still shaking my dizzy head over that one too
& it was just an arrant but extremely lucky & prolonged mishap
met some lovely people & places & wild good times
many of which i havent even reported
think of what might be possible in the realm of serendipity when
you get all the haps firing happily & the happenchances going
luckily at once
but i must tell you
it looks like i am headed back to afroeurasia next
or at least the european & african peninsulas of it
not sure yet
but it looks like it
But I think on a large expedition with
> many people on a limited time budget, there needs to
> be planning.
> Also, I can see how you would be responding to
> everyone instead of just me. I guess I just like to
> have the chance to have my own voice heard.
absolutely
& so you do & will have it here happily ever after
for this really is everyones land now & not just bp or bbp
Maybe
> something along what you were saying about each of us
> being individually divine - perhaps I wrongly
> perceived you to be discounting that for me.
you dont think it is possible to be a divine jerk
do you
but to really claim & own your personal sovereignty in this world
you practically have to be a jerk
youve got to do a lot of jerking around to even get it
& it includes the preposterous yet exact understanding that all
the other jerks really are divine too
for of course this is more than just a no fault reality
it is fully an all well reality
it is fully inflated with divinity sovereignty & wellness
but exactly how fully divine sovereign & well is a personal choice
i personally like my wellness etc multifold maxifold omnifold etc
& who wouldnt want more & better once they realized they could
& thats why i have been cocreating a multipointing place
a clearing in the woods for an extremely special activity
& my tries are not entirely frivolous because i know their value
& of course it is a jerk & a lurch when others completely miss
this special opportunity & value
mistaking it for an ordinary opportunity & value
& thus
bringing who knows what level of underpromotion to themselves
& i may point this out from time to time in one way or another
usually with a fair & simple question that is typically ignored
but it doesnt diminish my enjoyment or wellness etc
> And that is what I was referring to about the "jerks"
> thing. In 13490, you wrote
> "which is precisely why i suggested it
> as you can see again in my comments linked above
> namely
> to give the continent jerks a real bp ride for all
> their trouble
> or the best ride we can manage to give them anyway"
> I think people realize there is no legal boundary
> here.
indeed hopefully they now realize theres hardly anything at all
here
But in the absence of legal doctrine (national
> boundaries) or mathematical/physical fact (Tropics,
> Equator, parallels, meridians), why not, as you often
> say, let thought create reality?
it seems to me
thought does create reality whether one lets it or not
the thinking itself is the letting
so best to be an allower of this process
as of everything
& just let er rip
thats right
your thought
whatever it is
will matriculate into vibrationally corresponding life experience
willy nilly
thats how electromagnetically powerful you already are
& how bound the universe is to obey you
now then
what sort of thing do you want to make or attract
something that makes sense & comports with your own stated
intentions & best understanding
or something totally slobbery
or something perhaps in between until there is more clarity
& i agree natural boundaries & extremities & multipoints are far
more interesting than manmade ones
when you can even find them
yikes
like the secret hidden forgotten ends of the earth
yikes i cant wait
but manmade multipointing was mighty good while it lasted too
best of all tho is that we are all finally & absolutely true now
in whatever we may be doing here
end insertions
>
>
>
>
> --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > hahahahahahaha
> > ok you absolutely win mike
> > hahahahaha
> > i couldnt stuff another byte in
> > & had to cut from the bottom in order to even answer
> > hahahaha
> >
> > so not only have you attained the elusive maxi
> > message
> > boundary point once again
> > but
> > the cosmos itself has objectively called the entire
> > thread as well
> > fair & square
> > in your favor & honor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > & so this message now must begin a completely new
> > game
> > under a new title
> > seeing as all the stuffing from that last game is
> > now lost
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > Kaufman
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > Again, you misread and miscomprehend me.
> >
> > yup & yup
> >
> > Where did I
> > > put a 2 week limit on anything?
> >
> > you are right
> >
> > you did nothing of the sort
> >
> > it was others who spoke in terms of 2 weeks rather
> > than only 1
> > week
> > & not yourself
> >
> > & i was always considering only the ensemble
> > & not necessarily only considering you
> >
> > again i admit this
> > if it wasnt already clear the last time i admitted
> > it
> >
> > Please point this out
> > > as I never put this limit there. For some odd
> > reason,
> > > you keep speaking of this as though I have.
> >
> > so there you have the odd reason you may be seeking
> >
> > Second,
> > > reality is to my liking, as is the reality is that
> > my
> > > trip does not necessitate 10,000 miles. Or 9500
> > > miles. Or 11,000 miles. etc etc etc.
> >
> > excellent excellent excellent
> >
> > If you would
> > > like to plan a trip that does take 10,000 miles
> > that
> > > is fine.
> >
> > i know
> > i know
> > i not only plan but actually take some every year
> >
> > No one is stopping you. In fact I'd enjoy
> > > seeing your plan of one.
> >
> > well you already have them more or less entire in
> > the archive
> > but only in real time
> > tripointing to labrador 2000
> > tripointing to the northwest & southeast 2000 2001
> > 2002 2003
> > tripointing to the southwest & northeast 2000 2001
> > 2002 2003
> > & you know i am not so much for the planning as for
> > the actual
> > doing & going
> >
> > indeed frequently with as little planning as
> > possible
> >
> > so as to maximize the joys of serendipity
> >
> > But that does not concern
> > > the itinerary I personally came up with. You may
> > > enjoy driving random roads from the start to
> > finish,
> > > but if you wish to do so, you should account for
> > the
> > > distances in your own trip, not force them into
> > > someone elses.
> >
> > hahahahahaha
> > i disavow & if necessary actually withdraw even any
> > appearance
> > or illusion of ever having forced anything into
> > anything of anyone
> > elses
> >
> > & if it was even your subjective impression that i
> > have done so
> > then i must be all wet at least somewhere
> > since i did promise to be with you 100 percent
> >
> > Perhaps you could plan a GNASTP (Great
> > > North American Serendipitous Tripointing
> > > Peregrination) which would include thousands of
> > miles
> > > of allowances for driving roads from start to
> > finish.
> > > But that is not applicable here.
> > > Also, I do feel good, as I hope you do too.
> >
> > yes good thank you
> > for that is really all that matters
> > thank you
> >
> > I use
> > > emphasis to point out where you are
> > misunderstanding
> > > me, since it seems you quite often do. And I
> > think
> > > that perhaps it is you who should take a bp break
> > > until you stop calling people "jerks" if they
> > happen
> > > to bring up a topic which rankles you.
> >
> > that was a jerky lurch
> > hahaha
> > & i have never been rankled by anything
> > let alone here at bp
> > or by a topic
> > yikes
> > cmon
> >
> > it was lowell who said he was rankled
> >
> > & i dont even believe he was really rankled either
> >
> > he just has that way of speaking
> >
> > & the only people i can recall calling jerks
> > are those who actually do jerk the imaginary &
> > already jerky
> > continents & their imaginary & jerky borders about
> > tho i suppose
> > now that you mention it
> > i would add those who try to jerk the actual
> > definition of bp about
> > too
> > to fit their imagination or their desire
> >
> > but i dont fault or blame them
> > or you
> > or me
> >
> > do you
> >
> >
> > & it was silly of me to mistake your emphasis for
> > shouting
> >
> > & i certainly wouldnt try to stop anyone from doing
> > anything
> >
> > well perhaps i might try to prevent them from
> > harming
> > themselves
> >
> > but even there you know
> > thats very shaky ground to be on
> >
> > >
> > > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > > first of all mike
> > > > nothing is more important than that you feel
> > good
> > > >
> > > > so for starters
> > > > please leave your problems & your shouting
> > somewhere
> > > > else
> > > >
> > > > & be sure to come back here as soon as you are
> > > > feeling better
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > puzzles we got
> > > >
> > > > problems not
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > secondly
> > > > the reason i thought you didnt disallow peters &
> > > > dougs stops is
> > > > that you did explicitly disallow all my own
> > > > suggested stops below
> > > > but not any of the others
> > > > so far as i could tell
> > > >
> > > > so i figured
> > > > if you meant to disallow the others too
> > > > then you would have said so too
> > > >
> > > > & now that you have said so
> > > > i do understand
> > > >
> > > > you arent discounting them
> > > >
> > > > you are simply not counting them
> > > >
> > > > but mine you are actually discounting as well as
> > not
> > > > counting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so this is finally
> > > > exclusively & entirely
> > > > your own private itinerary that you are
> > measuring up
> > > >
> > > > i agree to that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & i also agree you should measure it exactly
> > however
> > > > you like
> > > > & should certainly ignore me & reality too
> > > > & particularly all the others who think 2 weeks
> > isnt
> > > > enough time
> > > > for alaska & new brunswick in any case whatever
> > the
> > > > mileage
> > > > especially if thinking about us gets you
> > > > disconnected from who
> > > > you really are
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > thats right
> > > >
> > > > unless reality is entirely to your liking
> > > > i say ignore it in favor of your dreams
> > > >
> > > > & i will be with you 100 percent if you should
> > do
> > > > that
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > thirdly
> > > > i havent been directing & am not directing
> > anything
> > > > at you
> > > > but have only been talking to you
> > > > & addressing what i thought you meant
> > > > just as i am also addressing now what i think
> > you
> > > > mean now
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > & in my view
> > > > you are fine
> > > > & indeed divine
> > > > whatever you mean