first of all mike
nothing is more important than that you feel good
so for starters
please leave your problems & your shouting somewhere else
& be sure to come back here as soon as you are feeling better
puzzles we got
problems not
secondly
the reason i thought you didnt disallow peters & dougs stops is
that you did explicitly disallow all my own suggested stops below
but not any of the others
so far as i could tell
so i figured
if you meant to disallow the others too
then you would have said so too
& now that you have said so
i do understand
you arent discounting them
you are simply not counting them
but mine you are actually discounting as well as not counting
so this is finally
exclusively & entirely
your own private itinerary that you are measuring up
i agree to that
& i also agree you should measure it exactly however you like
& should certainly ignore me & reality too
& particularly all the others who think 2 weeks isnt enough time
for alaska & new brunswick in any case whatever the mileage
especially if thinking about us gets you disconnected from who
you really are
thats right
unless reality is entirely to your liking
i say ignore it in favor of your dreams
& i will be with you 100 percent if you should do that
thirdly
i havent been directing & am not directing anything at you
but have only been talking to you
& addressing what i thought you meant
just as i am also addressing now what i think you mean now
& in my view
you are fine
& indeed divine
whatever you mean
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
<mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> Why did you think that? Your original claim was
> directed at me. You told me that I was pushing 10,000
> miles. I'm not discounting anyone else's stops. All
> I was doing was speaking of a list I had put together
> myself. Of course final itineraries are a
> collaborative effort. But if you were speaking of all
> of the stops you should have said so instead of
> directing it at me. Such lack of specificity
> (compounded by all your changes) causes problems. And
> if you want my list - It IS below!
>
> --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > ok
> > i thought you were including all of peters & dougs
> > stops too
> > which are also given below
> >
> > indeed all your suggestions below presupposed & were
> > stacked
> > upon theirs
> >
> > & i have been responding only to the cumulative list
> > here
> > rather than to some unknown selection from among
> > them all
> >
> >
> > & when did you start leaving theirs out anyway
> >
> > i admit that surprises me more than any of your
> > other changes
> >
> > but still no problem
> >
> > lets just list all your stops in detail anyway
> > somewhere if not here
> > whatever they are
> > as pete too appears to suggest now
> > or there will be no actual outcome or output at all
> >
> > just more garbage in & more garbage out
> >
> >
> > but once we actually know what we are actually
> > talking about
> > if ever
> > then i am sure we could really do it some justice
> > here at bp in
> > terms of precision try pointing
> >
> >
> > also
> > by flyby i only meant freeway or bypass miles
> > not airline miles
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > Kaufman
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > You are either not reading what I am writing or
> > are
> > > not understanding it. MY MILEAGE IS NOT FLY-BY
> > > MILEAGE BUT IS ROAD DISTANCE CALCULATED VIA
> > MAPQUEST.
> > > STOP TO STOP. You are also ignoring the fact that
> > I
> > > said "I was speaking concerning the stops I had
> > my
> > > list." (fortunately that is below so you can read
> > > that too). Please reread what is in my list. You
> > can
> > > rent cars in Vancouver and Bangor. The mileage IS
> > > 7540. That is ROAD distance, not some crude
> > > estimation. If you seem to be in such utter
> > > disbelief, why dont you actually calculate it out
> > on
> > > Mapquest instead of just assuming you are right?
> > Your
> > > addition of 1200 miles is completely unwarranted
> > as it
> > > is ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR. And your 700
> > serendipitous
> > > miles may be appropriate for you, but not
> > necessarily
> > > for everyone else. And it is not necessary to
> > expand
> > > upon the plus for the simple reasone that COMMON
> > SENSE
> > > tells you hotels plus food does not come to 2460
> > > miles!
> > >
> > > --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > > > well whatever you may or may not have changed
> > > > fortunately it is all still here below to check
> > > >
> > > > & if you really do want to know the truth
> > > > then why not spell out & measure up your full
> > > > itinerary as it is
> > > > rather than just the approximate fly by mileages
> > for
> > > > some of it
> > > >
> > > > & likewise why not actually estimate the parts
> > you
> > > > cant spell out
> > > > rather than shrugging them off with a vague plus
> > > > sign
> > > > as such variables can be guesstimed fairly well
> > from
> > > > experience
> > > >
> > > > until you do
> > > > i can only continue to imagine we might be
> > talking
> > > > about the
> > > > same trip
> > > > & to continue to figure it very crudely as
> > follows
> > > >
> > > > vancouver to beaver creek to hyder to vancouver
> > is
> > > > 3600 miles
> > > >
> > > > vancouver to international falls to detroit to
> > > > niagara to estcourt to
> > > > campobello to bangor all direct is 4000 miles
> > > >
> > > > & tho you claim this 4000 takes account of all
> > the
> > > > stops
> > > > i dont see how it can
> > > > because many of them involve substantial side
> > trips
> > > >
> > > > indeed the dozen or so mentioned destinations
> > that
> > > > are not on
> > > > this direct route add perhaps 1200 miles by my
> > own
> > > > wild guess
> > > >
> > > > serendipity & unplanned necessity & mistakes etc
> > add
> > > > perhaps
> > > > another 700 miles
> > > > or more
> > > >
> > > > so my grand total thus far is perhaps 9500 miles
> > or
> > > > more
> > > > which may not be so very different from what you
> > are
> > > > calling
> > > > 7540 miles plus
> > > > perhaps without fully realizing just how big
> > that
> > > > plus must be
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > btw
> > > > last time i tried
> > > > it wasnt possible to rent a driveaway dropoff
> > either
> > > > to or from
> > > > alaska
> > > > so that may not actually be an option for you
> > either
> > > >
> > > > perhaps you could do it in whitehorse
> > > > but
> > > > for the same economic reasons
> > > > i wouldnt count on it
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> > > > Kaufman
> > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > No. I am not changing what I am saying here,
> > nor
> > > > what
> > > > > you said. And I am not disagreeing with you
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > sake of pleasure. I am disagreeing with you
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > sake of truth. And I presented several
> > options
> > > > for
> > > > > arriving at distances. One of these was to
> > start
> > > > at
> > > > > around Beaver Creek. Another, LONGER route
> > was to
> > > > > rent a car in Vancouver, drive to Beaver
> > Creek,
> > > > then
> > > > > drive to Blaine. THIS route gives 7540 miles
> > > > > (finishing at Bangor). Any route starting at
> > the
> > > > > vicinity of Beaver Creek would be less, as
> > there
> > > > are
> > > > > in fact airports and car rental facilities
> > closer
> > > > to
> > > > > Beaver Creek than Vancouver. Taking the
> > LONGER
> > > > route
> > > > > of Vancouver to Beaver Creek to Blaine to
> > Bangor,
> > > > we
> > > > > have 7540 + stops, hotels, food. Which still
> > > > isn't
> > > > > 10,000 miles.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > > > > ah but mike
> > > > > > for the sheer pleasure of disagreeing with
> > me
> > > > > > you are now changing not only what i said
> > but
> > > > what
> > > > > > you said too
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you start from vancouver
> > > > > > you cant very well start from beaver creek
> > too
> > > > > > can you
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & thats only a few thousand extra miles you
> > > > still
> > > > > > havent counted
> > > > > > yet
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but i see now even peter
> > > > > > who started it all
> > > > > > has backed out
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & it sounds like dougs thru route wont even
> > be
> > > > > > leaving the
> > > > > > transcanada highway
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so that may leave only you & me to actually
> > go
> > > > > > border freaking
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hmm
> > > > > > so how about making it a tripointing
> > expedition
> > > > > > after all then
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > Michael
> > > > > > Kaufman
> > > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was speaking concerning the stops I had
> > in
> > > > my
> > > > > > list.
> > > > > > > And there are quite a few national car
> > chains
> > > > > > within
> > > > > > > range of the beginning and ending points.
> > > > It's
> > > > > > only a
> > > > > > > little over 110 miles from Campobello to
> > > > Bangor.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > > it's only 30 miles from Blaine to
> > Vancouver.
> > > > > > > (Vancouver and Bangor both have airports
> > and
> > > > car
> > > > > > > rental facilities.) This 140+ miles plus
> > > > wrong
> > > > > > turns
> > > > > > > plus driving to restaurants and hotels
> > etc,
> > > > sure
> > > > > > > doesn't come close to 2600 miles!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > haha
> > > > > > > > well it is true i was high in the andes
> > > > > > > > thank goodness
> > > > > > > > but what you are now actually saying
> > here
> > > > mike
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > minimum
> > > > > > > > namely
> > > > > > > > beginning from beaver creek of all
> > places as
> > > > if
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > really could
> > > > > > > > & then skipping skagway now
> > > > > > > > to hyder to point roberts to
> > international
> > > > falls
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > detroit to niagara
> > > > > > > > to estcourt to campobello
> > > > > > > > via all the other stops mentioned below
> > by
> > > > > > everyone
> > > > > > > > but me too
> > > > > > > > & within the terms of the actual 2 week
> > tour
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > contemplated
> > > > > > > > & even assuming direct travel & no wrong
> > > > turns
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > serendipity
> > > > > > > > which of course you cant because you
> > wont
> > > > > > actually
> > > > > > > > do that
> > > > > > > > & even assuming you could just end the
> > trip
> > > > at
> > > > > > > > campobello too
> > > > > > > > which you cant do either
> > > > > > > > will still add up on the odometer to far
> > > > more
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > the 7400 miles
> > > > > > > > you are seeing on your roadmap
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > so in the event of reality
> > > > > > > > if any
> > > > > > > > rather than teleportation to the start &
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > end
> > > > > > > > etc etc
> > > > > > > > you are certainly pushing if not
> > actually
> > > > into 5
> > > > > > > > digits of miles
> > > > > > > > even with this foreshortened itinerary
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & if you dont believe me
> > > > > > > > well then by all means try it with or
> > > > without
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > cocaine
> > > > > > > > but i dont see how anyone could actually
> > > > even
> > > > > > try to
> > > > > > > > make such a
> > > > > > > > try under any circumstances
> > > > > > > > let alone with a whole carload of people
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > & i say this having already driven about
> > 99
> > > > > > percent
> > > > > > > > of it myself
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > Kaufman
> > > > > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > No way. Blaine, WA to Campobello Is.
> > is
> > > > just
> > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > 4000 by Mapquest, taking into account
> > all
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > stops. Adding a segment of Skagway to
> > > > Blaine
> > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > 1500 miles. So that makes 5500 miles.
> > A
> > > > > > Yukon
> > > > > > > > > crossing near Beaver Creek could be
> > done
> > > > in
> > > > > > 1700
> > > > > > > > miles
> > > > > > > > > (distance to Blaine), which would make
> > > > 5700.
> > > > > > Even
> > > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > you were thinking of a round trip
> > segment
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > Blaine
> > > > > > > > > to Yukon to Blaine, you would still
> > only
> > > > get
> > > > > > 7400
> > > > > > > > > miles. Any of these figures are much
> > > > closer
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > 6000
> > > > > > > > > than 11,000. Were your calculations
> > done
> > > > > > while on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > aformentioned cocaine? heh heh heh ;)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > yes awful high
> > > > > > > > > > especially if you move gold rush
> > park
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > skagway
> > > > > > > > > > to practically
> > > > > > > > > > anywhere else
> > > > > > > > > > since that alone could save you over
> > > > 2000
> > > > > > miles
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > driving
> > > > > > > > > > & make your guess of closer to 6000
> > > > miles
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > 10000
> > > > > > > > > > correct
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > but if you moved gold rush park to
> > the
> > > > yukon
> > > > > > > > > > as it appears you may still be
> > intending
> > > > to
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > then you would be closer to 11000
> > miles
> > > > than
> > > > > > > > 6000
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In
> > BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > "Michael
> > > > > > > > > > Kaufman"
> > > > > > > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hmm 10,000 seems an awful high
> > > > estimate.
> > > > > > > > Closer
> > > > > > > > > > to 6,000 I
> > > > > > > > > > think.
> > > > > > > > > > > But regardless it seems Gold Rush
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > park
> > > > > > > > > > I was
> > > > > > > > > > looking for
> > > > > > > > > > > as that borders on BC, not YK.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In
> > BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > > > > > "acroorca2002"
> > > > > > > > > > <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > hahaha
> > > > > > > > > > > > hey it wouldnt be impractical to
> > > > just
> > > > > > > > remember
> > > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > > > would it
> > > > > > > > > > > > hahaha
> > > > > > > > > > > > as if an alaska to new brunswick
> > > > motor
> > > > > > tour
> > > > > > > > > > could actually be
> > > > > > > > > > > > done in the same 2 weeks anyway
> > > > > > > > > > > > hahaha
> > > > > > > > > > > > even without any of the other
> > > > mentioned
> > > > > > side
> > > > > > > > > > trips & stops
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > well maybe if you had enough
> > cocaine
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > but it looks like you are
> > already
> > > > > > pushing
> > > > > > > > 10000
> > > > > > > > > > miles there
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In
> > > > BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > > Kaufman
> > > > > > > > > > > > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm some of those I think
> > would
> > > > have
> > > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > > > precluded
> > > > > > > > > > > > > due to practicality. And the
> > > > > > Binational
> > > > > > > > tps
> > > > > > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > more a subject of another trip
> > I
> > > > > > think.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nice lists all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > & if we are really going to
> > do
> > > > the
> > > > > > full
> > > > > > > > > > 2week
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > great north american border
> > > > > > expedition
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > without mexico but with a
> > bazuco
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > then lets at least remember
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hans island cadk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > isle verte cafr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > & the diomedes ruus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the twin virgin idaho
> > british
> > > > > > columbia
> > > > > > > > > > tripoints
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > & others equally causal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes practically
> > coincident
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > choices
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > tho i wont spoil it by
> > telling
> > > > you
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > ones til we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > get close
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In
> > > > > > BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > > > > > Doug
> > > > > > > > > > Murray
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <doug@d...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't believe I missed
> > > > Haskell,
> > > > > > > > Beebe, &
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Canusa... and lunch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hurtibuse's! And dinner
> > at
> > > > > > Hoagie's
> > > > > > > > Pizza
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Newport,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vermont.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, March 9, 2004,
> > at
> > > > > > 10:31
> > > > > > > > PM,
> > > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaufman
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice job. I have been
> > > > > > constructing
> > > > > > > > > > (made it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > months ago and added
> > here
> > > > and
> > > > > > there)
> > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > own list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very similar to yours.
> > > > Though
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > a few
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > differences.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here it is:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CA-US:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gold Rush Int. Park -
> > YK/AK
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pt. Roberts, Peace Arch,
> > 0
> > > > Ave.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > North Portal, SK -
> > Portal,
> > > > ND
> > > > > > Golf
> > > > > > > > > > Course
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > International Peace
> > Gardens
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > International Peace Park
> > -
> > > > > > Waterton
> > > > > > > > > > Glacier,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alberta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > International Falls - MN
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pinecreek/Piney Airport
> > -
> > > > > > Pinecreek
> > > > > > > > MN,
> > > > > > > > > > Piney MB
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Detroit/Windsor Tunnel
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Niagara Falls
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zavikon Bridge & 1000
> > > > Islands
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NY/Que bar with pool
> > table
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Haskell, Beebe, Canusa
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Campobello - NB/ME
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Doug Murray
> > <doug@d...>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> We are definitely due
> > for a
> > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > > North
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > American
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Border Expedition
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (though, Mexico would
> > not
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > included
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Highlights:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Stewart BC-Hyder AK ( a
> > > > > > toughie, as
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > is so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > far
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> north)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Point Roberts
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Sleeping at the
> > Smugglers
> > > > Inn
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > Zero
> > > > > > > > > > Ave.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Zero Ave!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Peace Arch (BC-WA)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Peace Garden (MB-ND)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The Pineycreek (MB-MN)
> > > > Airport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Angle Inlet
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> International Falls, MN
> > -
> > > > Fort
> > > > > > > > Frances,
> > > > > > > > > > ON
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Windsor, ON - Detroit,
> > MI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Niagara Falls
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The intersection of
> > Douglas
> > > > &
> > > > > > > > Murray in
> > > > > > > > > > Fort
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Erie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ON (though for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> personal reasons!)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Akwesasne Reserve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The Border Bar (Fort
> > > > Covington,
> > > > > > NY
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > Dundee,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > QC)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The Border Golf Course
> > > > (ME-NB)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> And Campobello Island
> > > > (ME-NB)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2 weeks for this one!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Doug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Monday, March 8,
> > 2004,
> > > > at
> > > > > > 06:27
> > > > > > > > AM,
> > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hering
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hello all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I've just added a
> > picture
> > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > photo
> > > > > > > > > > section
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> BP:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> taken in Ft. Covington
> > -
> > > > > > border
> > > > > > > > > > Québec/NY.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Wouldn't it be nice to
> > > > have a
> > > > > > real
> > > > > > > > > > party
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > here??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Playing billiards -
> > one
> > > > leg in
> > > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > > country,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> drinking bourbon in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> the US, while smoking
> > a
> > > > nice
> > > > > > cigar
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Canada...!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> well, just say when -
> > I'll
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > there!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> all yours
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> MafiapeteDk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Peter Hering
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> de bedste hilsener
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> best regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> mit freundlichen
> > Grüssen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> <image.tiff>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> <image.tiff>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> To visit your group
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > web,
> > > > > > > > go
> > > > > > > > > > to:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe from
> > > > this
> > > > > > group,
> > > > > > > > > > send an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> to:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Your use of Yahoo!
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > subject to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Search - Find
> > what
> > > > you're
> > > > > > > > looking
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > faster
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://search.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Search - Find what
> > you're
> > > > > > looking
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > faster
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://search.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more
> > storage,
> > > > > > less
> > > > > > > > spam
> > > > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage,
> > > > less
> > > > > > spam
> > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage,
> > less
> > > > spam
> > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less
> > spam
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com