ok i had a feeling you might have been looking either for the
mentioned former detached inland section of diu called nagar
haveli
or else for the also mentioned but unnamed yet still extant
mainland complement to diu island
which does in fact bring to 3 the number of discrete extant parts
of daman diu
including 1 island & 1 other piece whose name could have
answered to your anjidiv or angediva
but lo here it is
presumably a 4th piece
http://72.1911encyclopedia.org/G/GO/GOA.htm
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "raedwulf16"
<raedwulf16@y...> wrote:
> Hi Thanks for the swift response..What I am looking for would
be
> more current than historical..I know that "Goa- Daman and Diu"
were
> all one political entity when taken by India from Portugal ...I am
> equally certain that Goa has been separated from Daman and
Diu since
> that time.
do you mean you think this source is wrong in giving separate
dates of 1961 & 1987 for these 2 events
I once saw...somewhere... a map that showed "Daman and
> Diu" as consisting of three discrete parts.. and i think the part
> in question was an island .. to the south.. called
> possibly "Anjidiv" or "Angediva" ???....in one source it said
> that "Daman and Diu" is politically "unitary"...but that need not
> preclude separate geographical "units" ..I think those
geographical
> units are Daman,Diu, and this "unknown as yet to me"
island??..
> Thanks again..I will find it... Possibly in Miriam-Webster's
> geographical dictionary...if I can get my paws on a copy. hasta
la
> vista ...Nos
> vemos...Saturday.....raedwulf
> In
> BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
wrote:
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "raedwulf16"
> > <raedwulf16@y...> wrote:
> > > Am I mistaken in thinking that there is a third somewhat
> > smaller
> > > part of this "union territory"(Daman Diu) somewhere to the
> > south on
> > > India's west coast? I think it is an island....(I might possibly
> > > have it confused with another part of Goa??)
> >
> > do you mean mistaken in thinking that there is
> > or mistaken in thinking that there was
> >
> > but this may settle everything on all the bits & pieces
> >
> http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/D/Daman.asp