Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: American ghost tripoints
Date: Feb 08, 2004 @ 19:09
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> > > I don't know when the provisional GBUS treaty of 1783 was ratified andOf course. My "1783" above was a typo. I meant "1782."
> > > effective
>
> the provisional gbus was 30 nov 1782
>
> & the 1783 gbus of 3 sept was not provisional but definite
> however you do raise an interesting quandaryI agree.
>
> my de jure claim assumes further ratification of this definitized 1783
> treaty to be unnecessary not only because it is confirmatory of the
> earlier 1782 version but also because the territory of the cession
> itself is the original territory & original jurisdiction of one of the
> 2 parties to the treaty itself
>
> for it seems to me that without this original territory this party
> the usa
> doesnt legally exist to sign anything
> now it may be that the treaty was subsequently ratified by theThe Articles of Confederation being in effect since March 1, 1781, ratification
> continental congress &or the british crown
> so should we therefore postdate the legal creation of the territory ofI don't either.
> the usa from this 3sept1783 date to such a slightly later date as
> necessary to reflect both of these subsequent ratifications
> if indeed there were any
>
> i dont think so
> or we could simply take the treaty dates at face valueSince de facto peace had long since broken out, I'm perfectly willing to take
> since they may have been effective retroactively anyway
> i dont know